xp is slow, win 2k way faster

Discussion in 'OT Technology' started by Kuwi, Jan 23, 2005.

  1. Kuwi

    Kuwi Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,860
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    U.S.A
    why would anyone use windows xp over win 2k? win 2k runs faster than xp.
     
  2. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    justify your statement. All tests I have run lean towards XP being faster and more stable.
     
  3. mdaniel

    mdaniel S is for Shiksa

    Joined:
    May 6, 2000
    Messages:
    52,388
    Likes Received:
    260
    Location:
    Northwest Mejicooooooo
    They're virtually the same thing once you take the extra eye candy off of XP. I've had great stability and performance with both operating systems as long as the system had enough RAM.
     
  4. Penetration

    Penetration OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    19,258
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    MMM my ding ding dong
    start > run > services.msc you can make either run marginally faster by editing that.
     
  5. johnson

    johnson New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2003
    Messages:
    38,412
    Likes Received:
    0
    Windows 2000 doesnt have Cleartype or msconfig (you can copy the file and put it to 2000 though)
     
  6. EvilSS

    EvilSS New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Messages:
    5,104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    STL
    How much RAM are you running? Like Jollyogre said, with the right amount of RAM (XP really needs at least 512mb) XP is faster and more stable than 2000 Pro.
     
  7. Kuwi

    Kuwi Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,860
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    U.S.A
    i have 1024 mb.
     
  8. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    XP is faster. You lose. 'nuff said.
     
  9. Sonar_un

    Sonar_un Prowler Orange

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York, NY
    You ASSume 2000 is faster than XP. But 2000 has its own issues. After working with, and using XP for quite a while now. I would never go back to 2000.

    With all the crap turned off, and a few good tweaks to XP, its just as fast, as 2000. Plus, it boots faster.
     
    Last edited: Jan 24, 2005
  10. zyg0te

    zyg0te I've made a huge mistake.

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    2,995
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    norcal
    u mean never go back to 2000?
     
  11. Sonar_un

    Sonar_un Prowler Orange

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York, NY
    LMAO!!

    Freudian slip?.. I think not
     
  12. MP

    MP New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Messages:
    34,377
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    you must have a crappy computer.
     
  13. Kuwi

    Kuwi Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2004
    Messages:
    4,860
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    U.S.A
    i've never actually ran windows xp on my pc, but just forget that I said xp is slow, xp is actually just as good as 2k.
     
  14. MrMan

    MrMan New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2004
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    0
    I prefer 2000, although I do have some systems using WinXP. I like simplicity. I know all about the classic views with WinXP. A better question in my case is, is it worth it to upgrade from 2000 to XP. I don't notice any significant differences, so I stick with 2000.
     
  15. james99654

    james99654 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,038
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Marietta, GA
    2000 is a really good and safe operating system if you're running a business. XP is really good for the time that I've used it. However, if you upgrade to XP Pro and forget about XP Home (which I think is shit) you'd be so much better off. I mean take off the eye candy and they run about the same. I'm just used to XP Pro now, so I'd go with that.
     
  16. Penguin Man

    Penguin Man Protect Your Digital Liberties

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,696
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, AB
    In my experience, Linux runs faster than either of them.
     
  17. 5Gen_Prelude

    5Gen_Prelude There might not be an "I" in the word "Team", but

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2000
    Messages:
    14,519
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC, CANADA
    MSDOS 6.x > *.* :hsd:
     
  18. 4W4K3

    4W4K3 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Messages:
    5,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TX
    XP + tweaks + disable 50% of the "eyecandy/services" = incredibly faster and more stable than 2000. (at least for me) I've run everything from Windows 3.1 to 2003, RedHat Linux...etc. XP Professional seems to be the most ideal OS for the home user, and even for overclockers/computer enthusiasts. Every OS has t's own advantages...but XP seems to run smoother than some of the others i've used b4. Boots faster too...(of course my old computer was slower than this one...so yah)

    true...but it takes a little experience to properly run Linux. Once you get settled in it's got it's advantages...but i don't think my mom or sister could run it and take advantage of it. For the advanced user it is good though.
     
  19. Penguin Man

    Penguin Man Protect Your Digital Liberties

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    21,696
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton, AB
    Actually, the new distros are at least as user-friendly as Windows, and very functional even for novice users. It takes a little experience to be a power user, but that's the same with any OS.
     
  20. 4W4K3

    4W4K3 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Messages:
    5,108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TX
    kewl...i haven't got much experience with Linux myself even lol. Helped install RedHat on server and messed with it...but that's about it cuz' soon after switched it to 2K3. Alot of my buddies run some version of it on there gaming computers cuz' they claim it's faster as well.
     
  21. figment

    figment New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tampa bay
    whats a good place to learn what stuff to turn of to make it run faster
     
  22. dijital

    dijital New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,896
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Nor Cal
    www.tweakxp.com
     
  23. Ziggy!Talon

    Ziggy!Talon Guest

  24. Ziggy!Talon

    Ziggy!Talon Guest

    i do love win2k though, its running on another machine in the house..
     
  25. COMplex

    COMplex New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    7,565
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Denver, CO. / New Haven, CT.
    I <3 Server 2003

    But XP is good too.
     

Share This Page