GUN What's your opinion on AK-47 pistols?

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by Jago, Apr 6, 2006.

  1. Jago

    Jago It helps if you hit it.

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2000
    Messages:
    27,965
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    I have an underfolder, if you want to just send a shitload of ammo down range its fun with the stock folded, but if you want to actually try to hit your target you need the stock, I would rather have a Krink then a pistol.
     
  3. Jago

    Jago It helps if you hit it.

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2000
    Messages:
    27,965
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's the difference between a Krinkov and any other AK pistol. :dunno:
     
  4. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    [​IMG]

    Krink has a folding stock, disadvantage is its an SBR and needs a tax stamp, you can put a fake supressor on it and get around that though.
     
  5. Jago

    Jago It helps if you hit it.

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2000
    Messages:
    27,965
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks. Can an side or under folder be added to an AK pistol later? Ofcourse that would mean you'd have to pay the $200 stamp too, right?
     
  6. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    It would require a different rear trunion to put a stock on one, and yes also a stamp.
     
  7. Soybomb

    Soybomb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    They look fun but I'd rather have the kel-tec plr-16 and 5.56 The ability to use cheap wolf would be a nice advantage of the ak-47 pistol though.
     

Share This Page