The company that ripped off the Shuffle is now ripping off the Nano...

Discussion in 'OT Technology' started by Bolicious, Sep 29, 2005.

  1. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
  2. That was out before the Nano.
     
  3. Looking at the site, they have 9 different MP3 players that are exactly the same damned thing.
     
  4. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
    Um no. The nano ripoff "Pico" design just came out and it's still only a photoshopped image.
     
  5. :slap:

    No, I remember seeing one in a store months before the Nano was released.
     
  6. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
    Hahahaha oh yeah?

    A) They only have 3 products on the market, and that's not one of them
    B) Unless you were in a store in Taiwan, you didn't see any of their products
    C) You are full of shit
     
  7. Typical Mac fag denying the facts. I was in Taiwan. :Owned:
     
  8. untoastytoast

    untoastytoast The Glory Days

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    10,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Palace of Auburn Hills
    the shuffle rip off was a publicity stunt, i read on article about it on slashdot (i'm pretty sure it was slashdot)
     
  9. inamorata

    inamorata New Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2004
    Messages:
    23,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    :joshers:
     
  10. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
    You have to be the biggest moron on this board.

    What's wrong? Did your mommy not hug you enough?
     
  11. Yeah, says the idiot who thinks Apple invented the Nano. :mamoru:
     
  12. RotorBalls

    RotorBalls Gonz

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2000
    Messages:
    47,416
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    RBWH
    :rofl: @ you two arguing about some crappy electronics. I didn't even know this forum existed. Doubt I'll be back in here :o
     
  13. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
    Linux sack rider. :mamoru:
     
  14. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
    You finally made the list toolbag. :cool:
     
  15. RotorBalls

    RotorBalls Gonz

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2000
    Messages:
    47,416
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    RBWH
    :o Hardly a sack rider...just an admirerer from afar :cool:
     
  16. Bolicious

    Bolicious Handleobraese

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2000
    Messages:
    43,793
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ellicott City, MD
    Being that OS X and linux know each other pretty well, you know that you secretly have a thing for Macs :mamoru:
     
  17. RotorBalls

    RotorBalls Gonz

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2000
    Messages:
    47,416
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    RBWH
    I've liked them since I had to support them working for earthlink. I just don't own one and probably never will unless I can get one for cheaper than cheap
     
  18. I didn't make any list toolbag. :confused:
     
  19. Even though Mac OS X is based on the Unix kernel, a rival OS? :mamoru:
     
  20. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mac OS X is not in any way based on the 'UNIX' kernel. Its MACH BSD.
     
  21. BSD is UNIX.
     
  22. newsroom_can

    newsroom_can Canada eh?

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    17,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    iblawsuit
     
  23. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    No. AT&T System V is UNIX. Or NO! Wait... SCO is Unix. As far as I know, Berkeley never owned the rights to "Unix," and was in fact the "OSSish" alternative to UNIX of its day. Academic, not corporate, designed specifically NOT to be Unix, in the literal sense that code was checked against UNIX code and then ordered rewritten until it didn't match up enough to cause a legal problem.

    So... wrong. Whats more, Free/Open/NetBSD and Linux both share all the core applications of the two operating systems: GNU, X, etc. They play very nicely, and don't compete: they complement.
     
  24. IcyHot4Life

    IcyHot4Life Str8 Ballin'

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Messages:
    18,151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Inquire Within
    :bowdown: that'll fall on deaf ears, but it had to be said anyway :bigthumb:
     
  25. SCO and BSD are derivatives. Apps are not the OS.
     

Share This Page