Tell me why I shouldnt buy a 24" Imac

Discussion in 'OT Technology' started by Tre003, Feb 14, 2008.

  1. Tre003

    Tre003 OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    281
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    MA
    I'm listening :squint:
     
  2. urban ape

    urban ape take that take that take that

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2003
    Messages:
    9,220
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    League City, Texas
    reasons why you shouldnt: 0.00
     
  3. LOUDSYSTEM

    LOUDSYSTEM New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Messages:
    68,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Peoria, AZ
    none

    buy it
     
  4. Because you should buy the Mac Pro and the 30" display.
     
  5. lowfat

    lowfat 24/Mac/SciFi/PC Crew OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Messages:
    63,949
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Grande Prairie, AB, Can
    Because the current generation iMac is reaching the end of its cycle.
     
  6. Blair

    Blair New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    8,532
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Oregon
    are you on crack? the current imac will be with us a while, much too long to wait out.
     
  7. Tvan

    Tvan New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    No, it's not even close to being cycled out. It's only been out for six months.
     
  8. lowfat

    lowfat 24/Mac/SciFi/PC Crew OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Messages:
    63,949
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Grande Prairie, AB, Can
    iMacs are generally updated every 6 months.

    Plus with all of Intels new mobile processors out, Apple is behind since they haven't been using them.

    I would definitely expect and update sooner than later.

    http://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#iMac
     
  9. jackback52

    jackback52 Guest

    Just STFU and buy the machine

    Resistance is Futile.
     
  10. EB

    EB 2/24/08

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,022
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TEXAS
    because the 20" is good enough :dunno:

    (i like mine anyways :hs:)
     
  11. cftofu2k

    cftofu2k OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2003
    Messages:
    2,949
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    get it.

    i have the 20'' maxed out with third party 4gb ram. shoulda went with the 24'' :doh:
     
  12. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    /thread.
     
  13. skolen

    skolen Guest

    If you don't mind having external drives for when you fill up the internal it should be fine. I mean, you can pop it open and swap drives, but that would be a hassle.
     
  14. hebrewnational

    hebrewnational New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    56
    Likes Received:
    0
    because it sucks for games and the hardware is outdated for the price. I was going to get one too but decided to build a monster PC with 24" for much cheaper. I still have my powerbook though.
     
  15. dorkultra

    dorkultra OT's resident crohns dude OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    Messages:
    22,736
    Likes Received:
    27
    Location:
    yinzer / nilbog, trollhio
    because its a pain in the ass to upgrade the internal hard drive

    but connecting an external only takes a second
     
  16. bovine

    bovine New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,883
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    :rolleyes:

    I think there's not much overlap between the group of people who want an all-in-one computer embedded in the monitor and the group of people who want to play video-games and have a 600w power supply fan screaming at them out of a behemoth of a tower.
     
  17. trouphaz

    trouphaz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,666
    Likes Received:
    0
    my only concern with the iMac (any all-in-one system really) is that it seems so wasteful. by building the system and the monitor into one unit, you are forced to throw out a potentially useful monitor once you want to upgrade the system. in my years owning PCs, i've always found that the monitor way outlives the life of the computer that it is attached to. i can usually keep a monitor for the life of 2 separate PCs.

    i understand that Apple computers generally have a longer useful lifespan than a traditional PC, so that may make the lifespan of the computer part closer to the monitor.
     
  18. BlueJeans

    BlueJeans Money For Nothing

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2004
    Messages:
    2,486
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Out There
    Good point. Could the monitor in the iMac work as a stand alone second monitor if the machine failed/became obsolete/some kids stole my hard drive?
     
  19. lowfat

    lowfat 24/Mac/SciFi/PC Crew OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Messages:
    63,949
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Grande Prairie, AB, Can
    no
     
  20. trouphaz

    trouphaz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,666
    Likes Received:
    0
    the issue you have though is that Apple doesn't give you a choice. you can go very low end or very high end for a separate monitor and system. for the mid-range where most people shop, they only have the iMac line.

    it is a great form factor. it looks slick. the price is reasonable for a 24" monitor on a decent Apple system. there is really nothing i would complain about other than the waste. aside from dead pixels, it just seems like LCD monitors last a very long time. i wonder if Apple will (or has) put together an iMac recycling program.
     
  21. RedGoober4Life

    RedGoober4Life New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    DTW
    GONE.

    :hsugh:
     
  22. RaginBajin

    RaginBajin Have you punched a donkey today?

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2001
    Messages:
    8,740
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NoVA
    Just make your own hackintosh. I built one for about 1000.00. It has 2gb of Ram, Quad-Core CPU in it and 500GB Hd connected to my 24" monitor. It rocks.
     
  23. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    The problem is that there's a fairly large gap between an iMac and a Mac Pro.

    I would be one example. I would personally use a Mac if I they had an affordable, tower-based chassis that came with a Core2Duo or Core2Quad. I would want around 4GB RAM, and probably a 250GB or 500GB drive. I would also want a mid-range discrete graphics adapter -- along the lines of a 8600GT or 2600/3850XT.

    The problem is that you jump in price from a $1000 system with a $500 built-in monitor to a $2500 system.

    I want to see a $1000-1500 system that is tower-based, easily upgradeable, discrete graphics, etc.

    I think we would see a lot more Mac "power users" if that became an available product. As great as I think the Mac Pro is, I just don't think it's a good buy.
     
  24. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    if you buy a new mac, they will recycle your old one.
     
  25. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    :werd: this is my exact issue. I find the iMac does not give me what I want. Yet the Mac Pro is simply too much money. I really want an in-between system.
     

Share This Page