GUN San Francisco Superior Court strikes down gun ban, FTW!

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by cellphonedude, Jun 13, 2006.

  1. San Francisco Superior Court Rejects Gun Ban;
    2nd Amendment Upheld

    Yesterday, San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren struck down the San Francisco handgun ban, asserting that under California law local officials do not have the authority to ban firearms from law-abiding citizens. The National Rifle Association (NRA) opposed the ban from its inception.


    NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre stated, "This ruling is a major victory for freedom and for the National Rifle Association. Proposition H was an ill-conceived gun ban scheme that would have violated the rights of only the law-abiding in San Francisco. We fought this outrageous attack on the constitutional rights of the good guys and we prevailed. We are determined not to see this gross injustice happen again and will fight any effort by politicians to resurrect this faulty proposal."


    The San Francisco gun ban would have prohibited law-abiding city residents from purchasing firearms - rifles, shotguns and handguns - for any lawful reason, whether for self-defense, hunting or recreational shooting. In addition, current law-abiding gun owners would have to surrender their registered handguns to the police.


    Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist, stated, "We are pleased with the decision of Judge James Warren of the California Superior Court. In today's ruling, Judge Warren ruled California law prohibits a city or county from banning handgun possession by law-abiding adults. This ruling supports the premise of NRA's argument. The NRA filed it's lawsuit soon after Proposition H passed arguing that the proposition was in violation of California preemption laws that say firearm laws are regulated by the state."


    The San Francisco Police Officers Association also opposed the ban, stating that the new law nullified "the personal choice of city residents to lawfully possess a handgun for self-defense purposes."


    Cox continued, "It seems evident that the authors of this measure either intentionally misled voters during the election or authored this proposed measure with gross disregard of California law. Regrettably, the biggest losers were the voters in this municipality who had to bear the considerable financial burden to satisfy the careless political whim of their elected officials."


    NRA and its Civil Rights Defense Fund presently support more than 60 cases involving the constitutional rights of gun owners. NRA filed a lawsuit challenging gun confiscations in the wake of Katrina (NRA v. New Orleans) and to clarify California's so-called "assault weapon" law (Hunt v. Lockyer). It successfully challenged the San Francisco gun ban (NRA v. San Francisco), and it is challenging seizures of firearms at New York and New Jersey airports contrary to federal safe passage law (John Torraco and William Winstanley in New York and Gregg Revell in New Jersey). Successes include striking down unconstitutional laws in Wisconsin (State v. Hamdan), New Mexico (Baca v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety), Oregon (State v. Dalgado), and West Virginia (State ex rel. City of Princeton v. Buckner). NRA also supported cases involving successful self-defense, for example, Jeffrey Kinder, Sr., and Jeffrey Kinder III (Arizona) and Tracey Roberts (Iowa).


    --nra--
     
  2. Dsking85

    Dsking85 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    13,443
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    ECU
  3. hey you anti-gun faggots.. stick that in your pipe and smoke it :fawkd:
     
  4. Gimik

    Gimik New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    36,559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Feenicks, Az
    hahahaha! awesome! This made my day.
     
  5. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
  6. 007

    007 Riden, sliden, whipin and dippin, my chrome strips

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,653
    Likes Received:
    0
    Guess now people dont have to use pepper spray to fend off muggings from bums with dirty hiv needles, oh wait they still cant carry? lol.
     
  7. Artyboy

    Artyboy Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere in CO
    :rofl:
     
  8. :bowrofl:
     
  9. 007

    007 Riden, sliden, whipin and dippin, my chrome strips

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2002
    Messages:
    1,653
    Likes Received:
    0
    http://www.sfgov.org/site/police_index.asp?id=24021

    I Guess they guy who shot up that cop, didnt get the memo, that fully auto 47's where banned in 1986, just imagine, if he knew the laws, he would have turned it in, and if guns where illegal, all criminals would line up around the block, to give back all there weapons! oh wait they wont, and the only people who will be disarmed is the hardworking honest americans.
     
  10. you're preaching to the choir :hs:
     
  11. Blind Prophet

    Blind Prophet New Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,269
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Arkansas
    :bigthumb:
     
  12. Iceburn

    Iceburn Made in the USA

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Wow that is just stupid. I am really glad that it didnt get passed.
    :bowdown: The NRA Lobbyists
     
  13. Alphaeus

    Alphaeus New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    12,101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    Now if only Chicago would follow :x:
     
  14. Wayne LaPierre > *
     

Share This Page