Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by twinturboteddy, Jul 30, 2008.
A Time attack event in Fontana from the other week.
A slight motion blur was added.
...why the added motion blur?
Too blurred for me
doesn't really look like panning, and the blur overlaps onto the car
I like it.
Yeah, me too. I dont think the blur on the car takes away from it, it adds to the feeling of motion.
you probably like the photo of the married couple in the brandy glass don't you?
I added the motion blur because the red building was too distracting. The word "TACO" was blurred but still legible. I think with the blur added it removes the distraction of the building.
The car is blurred in different stages because it was moving at an angle there is no way to have the entire car in focus. The motion blurred upped it a little but not by much.
This was just what I liked out of the frames I took. I'm no pro, so all your comments good or bad I learn from. The little that i added was what I thought helped the composition.
i was also at that event and took pics from the same area in the late afternoon
(was on the other side of the track in the infield earlier in the day)
Great shot, i like the added blur
if the motion blur wasnt added to the car, it MIGHT be more believable.
Was this taken during the earthquake?
What wedding shot in the brandy glass?
looks wayyyy to fake to me
The added blur sucks dude. There is VERY noticeable ghosting around the car and it just looks fake as hell.