Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by WRX, Aug 14, 2004.
The only bad thing is the seats in the WRX im a big guy
id go for an evo, just seems more daily drivable, but if i wanted a "race" car, id go with the sti and strip it, and rally that bitch.
The EVO is smaller.
STi, in white please.
It's a close call but I like how the EVO looks better. But comparing the STi to the normal EVO isn't really a fair comparison since the STi is a beefed up version of the WRX...perhaps comparing the beefed up Japanese version of the EVO (can't recall the name right now) would be a more apples to apples comparison?
im a mitsu sack rider, and i think id take an sti. maybe just cause ive been in a lancer the past few years, and im tired of the look
i like the looks of the sti better. but evo is faster.
are we voting on performance or is reliability taken into account?
None of the above.
Evo Handling > STi Handling
1.28.9 vs 1.30.1
Oh and the WR-1 is slower than the old Evo, and the EVO FQ is 3secs quicker than WR-1
JDM versions right?
not watered down american evo or 2.5 liter STi?
evo either way
basically every review of the two cars has said the exact opposite
Evo nazi checking in.
at poll results
MORE HORSEPOWER = FASTAR!!!!!!!!!
People are picking the STi because its more expensive and rarer than the evo.
I picked STi because I don't trust mitsubishi, they're both very nice cars though
one of each. and an r32 and whatever awd 270h plus car comes down the pike. gawd what pussies.
I consider myself a Subie enthusiast
I'd rather stay loyal to one brand than jump from one to one because of track times.