A&P Nikonauts! Should i sell my 85mm f/1.4

Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by dmora, Jan 5, 2010.

  1. dmora

    dmora Guest

    I'm wondering if i should sell this lens. I'm going to be buying the 70-200VR soon. So im curious since the focal range overlap will make this lens collect dust in my camera bag? :hs:

    Its been a hoss all these years i've had it.

    I have a Nikon D700, 14-24 f/2.8, and i'll be getting the 70-200 and a 35mm f/2.
     
  2. Mutombo

    Mutombo New Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2006
    Messages:
    5,289
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco
    If you shoot a lot of portraits I'd keep it. It's one of the best lenses in the Nikon lineup.
     
  3. dmora

    dmora Guest

    Yea i love it. I'd just like to offset my 70-200 cost. :hs:

    I mostly used it because i needed awesome low light performance for the type of shooting i do, night time street photography. :hs:
     
  4. tenplanescrashing

    tenplanescrashing Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    9,287
    Likes Received:
    0
    there is no problem with overlap. 85mm on a prime vs. 85mm in a zoom won't yield the same shot for the most part.
     
  5. dmora

    dmora Guest

    And those nagers at NIkon need to get off their ass and give me a 35mm f/1.4 :mad:
     
  6. dmora

    dmora Guest

    Good to know. :cool:
     
  7. 1992 240SX

    1992 240SX New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Long Beach, CA
    I kept it. I use it for decorations and portraits. It's sharper than the 70-200.
     
  8. wizeguy4

    wizeguy4 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2002
    Messages:
    2,454
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Allentown, PA
    I would keep it - It gives you 2 more stops than the 70-200 will give you
     
  9. Heinzanova

    Heinzanova OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    14,331
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    Singapore, Singapore
    It might have better subject isolation, but I wouldn't agree it is sharper.

    That 70-200 is sharper than a razorblade inside a vietcong's vagina
     
  10. Wobistdu

    Wobistdu Guest

    you would know something about this
     
  11. 1992 240SX

    1992 240SX New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Long Beach, CA
    I dunno, my 70-200 doesnt impress me really. Its great overall but it's def. not as sharp as any prime Ive shot with.
     
  12. Heinzanova

    Heinzanova OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Messages:
    14,331
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    Singapore, Singapore
    That is sad, I have to say mine focuses more accurately than any prime I used, and is as sharper than any prime I have used.

    So question is, do you have an iffy copy of the 70-200 or I have bad primes?

    Although my 600mm prime is pretty sharp :)
     
  13. legendr34

    legendr34 Titanium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2000
    Messages:
    4,433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SoCal
    one cannot compare the 70-200 with the 85mm 1.4, the 85 is sharper, faster and creates incredible bokeh the 70-200 cannot duplicate
     
  14. Wheezer

    Wheezer OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    1,629
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Houston
    Don't listen to this. It's crap! I'll do you a favor and take it off your hands for $200.
     
  15. HaloZ

    HaloZ New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2004
    Messages:
    865
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Corpus Christi Tx!!
    keep it..
     
  16. IAMHERENOWv0.0

    IAMHERENOWv0.0 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    prime > zoom
     

Share This Page