MIL Military turning towards the left - Times are changing boys

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by fintheman, Jan 8, 2007.

  1. fintheman

    fintheman I will ebay O/T!

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brentwood, TN
    Weaning the military from the GOP


    A less partisan military is good for democracy and allows a more frank debate on national security.
    January 5, 2007

    BURIED IN THE NEWS last week was one of the most potentially significant stories of recent years. The Military Times released its annual poll of active-duty service members, and the results showed something virtually unprecedented: a one-year decline of 10 percentage points in the number of military personnel identifying themselves as Republicans. In the 2004 poll, the percentage of military respondents who characterized themselves as Republicans stood at 60%. By the end of 2005, that had dropped to 56%. And by the end of 2006, the percentage of military Republicans plummeted to 46%.

    The drop in Republican Party identification among active-duty personnel is a sharp reversal of a 30-year trend toward the "Republicanization" of the U.S. military, and it could mark a sea change in the nature of the military — and the nature of public debates about national security issues.

    For most of U.S. history, issues of national security rarely divided Americans along sharp party lines: The old adage that "politics ends at the water's edge" generally held true. The military, while institutionally conservative with a small "c," was not closely identified with a particular political party. But somewhere between the end of the Vietnam War and the middle of the Clinton era, the U.S. military began to look like a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Republican Party.

    The rightward shift was dramatic: In 1976, 25% of civilians characterized themselves as Republicans, while 33% of military officers were Republicans — a military-civilian "gap" of only 8%. By 1996, the military-civilian gap on party affiliation had grown to 33%; while 34% of civilians self-identified as Republicans, so did a whopping 70% of military officers.

    In Britain, the Anglican Church used to be snidely described as "the Tory Party at Prayer." In the United States over the last 30 years, the military became, to a significant extent, the Republican Party at War.

    The Republicanization of the professional military came about for many reasons, some obvious, some less so. To some extent, it resulted from changing perceptions of how "pro-military" the two main parties were: In the wake of the Vietnam War, the Democratic Party became associated, in the popular mind, with antiwar, antimilitary policies. With the end of Vietnam-era conscription, which guaranteed a relatively representative military, a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats may have opted to join the military (at least as officers), while many career military personnel transferred their allegiance to the political party they saw as "on their side."

    But the Republicanization of the military was not just because of "natural" self-selection. It also resulted from changed recruitment and base-closing policies, combined with the steady Republicanization of the American South. The period since the late 1960s saw the closure of many northeastern ROTC programs and the expansion of those programs in the South. By the late 1990s, more than 40% of all ROTC programs were in the South — mainly at state universities — though the South is home to fewer than 30% of the nation's college students. Similar patterns in base closures have meant that disproportionate numbers of military personnel are now stationed at bases in the South and Southwest.

    For a time, the Republicanization of the military became self-reinforcing. The GOP has controlled the White House for all but 12 of the last 34 years and has made a determined effort to identify itself with the military and to court military voters. By the turn of the millennium, the perception that Republicans were "pro-military" while Democrats were "soft" on defense had become an entrenched facet of American politics.

    The latest Military Times poll offers the most telling evidence yet that this is beginning to change. Although the reasons for the recent military flight from the Republican Party can only be guessed at, it's a safe bet that disgust at Bush administration bungling in Iraq is the single biggest factor.

    The poll shows that only 35% of military personnel approve of the president's handling of the war, and three-fourths of those polled say that the military is "stretched too thin to be effective." Anecdotal evidence suggests that many career officers also are skeptical of the administration's approach to combating terrorism and unhappy with its undermining of the norms of the Geneva Convention.

    The partial de-Republicanization of the military is a hopeful sign — and not just for Democrats. A politicized military presents a threat to democratic ideals of civilian control. Over the last 30 years, the Republicanization of the military also has had a deeply distorting effect on public debates about national security, making it almost impossible to question Republican national security policies without being labeled "anti-military."

    As we struggle to move beyond the horrors of Iraq, we desperately need to develop fresh approaches to changing security threats. That requires a military that isn't partisan — and political leaders who won't make posturing in front of the troops a substitute for responsible policies.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-brooks5jan05,0,3406790.column?coll=la-opinion-center


    Its a good feeling to know that I wasn't the lone liberal when I was in the service and now I am happy to see that many more members are starting think for themselves instead of letting "old sarge" influence how they think politically.

    Turn for the better, imnho.
     
  2. Ranger-AO

    Ranger-AO I'm here for the Taliban party. Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    34,662
    Likes Received:
    150
    Location:
    the places in between
    The Democrats are buying the military vote with benefit bills (to prove that they are pro-military even though they oppose everything the military stands for). :hsugh:
     
  3. fintheman

    fintheman I will ebay O/T!

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brentwood, TN
    The Military Times over the last few years has seemigly started becoming a force inside of policitcs and true military views.

    They called for the resignation of Rummy and look what happened. While I am not a lefty, I'm by no means a righty, but personally I think this is a move in the right direction.

    It seems that people in the military are starting to realize the do have a voting power and they are starting to wonder how long the crap in Iraq is going to be drug out for.
     
  4. whitecouch

    whitecouch spendin' our golden years in OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,499
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mattersville
    In for a change of pace.
     
  5. MrRyan

    MrRyan Gary Johnson 2016 OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    159,093
    Likes Received:
    208
    Location:
    Colorado Part Year Resident
    You really don't want to talk this up in here...especially with me watching because I'll crush everything you have to say.

    Don't you even try to come in here and equate what the chickenshits @ the Military Times had to say about Rumsfeld in his final days.
     
  6. Immortal1

    Immortal1 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,308
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Masshole
    :x:
     
  7. TRN

    TRN Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2003
    Messages:
    55,113
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    North East
    :confused:

    EYOB...you deleting your damn posts again?
     
  8. fintheman

    fintheman I will ebay O/T!

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,092
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brentwood, TN
    What do you mean - are you saying the military times is hand selecting the people that they poll.

    I'm not saying it, the people that are active duty are saying it.

    Go "talk it up" to them. People are finally seeing the light of the bullcrap that has been happening for the last few years and a few raises aint' going to do shit this time.
     

Share This Page