Killer NIC article.

Discussion in 'OT Technology' started by deusexaethera, Dec 13, 2008.

  1. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    Old news, but new to me.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/killer-nic-network,2035.html

    Apparently it doesn't just lower your ping time, it also offloads UDP processing (used for games, as opposed to TCP/IP used for web surfing) so the CPU doesn't have to dick around with it. There's other stuff that it does, too, which I kinda understand but not well enough to summarize. So there might actually be something useful about the card after all.
     
  2. GOGZILLA

    GOGZILLA Double-Uranium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,760
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Plantation, FL
    ill have to see some benchmarks first. id guess that networking is a very small percentage of the processing power needed for games. some of their other ideas that he was talking about was really cool but im guessing a couple of fps gain and a few ms off ping which for $150 doesnt seem too great.
     
  3. Limp_Brisket

    Limp_Brisket New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    48,422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utah
    i already knew all that and still think it's a stupid investment.
     
  4. GOGZILLA

    GOGZILLA Double-Uranium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    10,760
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Plantation, FL
    just read a review on anandtech about it and like i guessed it was incredibly marginal performance gains. maybe if you were doing full blown file transfers with udp itd make a bigger difference but the amount of data that games send really isnt that much
     
  5. BlazinBlazer Guy

    BlazinBlazer Guy Witness to The De-Evolution of Mankind.

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,783
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lansing, MI USA
    I've actually seen one of those in person.... once. One of the guys that collocates servers in the datacenter I work in has one in a box that serves as a game server. I suppose for that sort of application it does make a bit of sense.

    Personally I still say if you want a creme-de-la-creme NIC, just go out and pick up an Intel PRO/1000 or something of that nature.
     
  6. trouphaz

    trouphaz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,666
    Likes Received:
    0
    i wish i could find some review i read a while back. they said it actually does help... but it was marginal. in WoW it greatly reduced the lag in certain areas that were known to be really bad and in some FPS games it helped increase the response time a little bit. but, who knows if just spending that same money on more ram, a better video card or better processor would help just as much.
     
  7. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    The concept seems clouded - virtually zero latency comes from your LAN or your NIC or your PC. Its on the network.
     
  8. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's pretty much the hallmark of digital equipment, though; either it's fast enough or it isn't. If the network load in one area of WoW isn't enough to overwhelm your NIC card, adding a better one will do nothing.
     
  9. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since your internet connection is much slower than your NIC...
     
  10. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think that's the issue; from what I read, the Killer NIC is supposed to take the constant stream of small packets that MMO games use and feed them to the game one at a time as soon as they're received instead of holding onto them until it reaches a certain limit, which is how games are designed to run -- small quantities of data updated in a realtime basis. Connection speed doesn't matter much, so long as you have some kind of broadband, because you're downloading coordinates and action codes, not torrents.
     
  11. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Connection latency matters. Ethernet is instant. The WAN is not.
     
  12. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    Okay, so it can't solve all the problems, but being optimized for programs that need small amounts of data right now as opposed to large amounts of data whenever it's ready should help.

    I'm not saying it's all things to all people, just that it appears to not be totally useless like a lot of people had speculated.
     
  13. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Maybe this is a dumb question... but when did games start using TCP in the first place? Games used to all use UDP.
     
  14. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    They called it TCP offloading on page one, but they really meant UDP offloading.

    This is dumb. This is the $500 speaker cable of the gaming world.

    I read the article. I'm not being a dick to you when I say that this is the stupidest piece of shit article, and stupidest piece of shit product that ANYONE has EVER posted here.

    Seriously.
     
  15. Limp_Brisket

    Limp_Brisket New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    48,422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utah
    no, it's useless.
     
  16. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mac or PC: this thing is a stupid piece of shit.
     
  17. Limp_Brisket

    Limp_Brisket New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    48,422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utah
    just think of this from a sensible stand-point. no one is saying it doesn't try to solve problems... the thing is, the problems it's solving are inconsequential!

    ok, so this card claims to reduce work on the processor by offloading network processing to the card. how much strain is put on the processor by processing network information? A VERY NEGLIGIBLE AMOUNT. so that's worthless.

    it claims to decrease latency by doing this. how much latency is introduced into your RTT going from the RJ45 connector to your O/S? A VERY NEGLIGIBLE AMOUNT. so also worthless.

    so in essence you're paying a premium price for a product that solves inconsequential problems. [​IMG]
     
  18. Peyomp

    Peyomp New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Messages:
    14,017
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah... a 486 makes a hell of a web server. That tells you something about the load a network stack makes.

    All the latency is in the WAN. This is quite literally like super expensive golden speaker cables. I bet its the same people.

    Hey, I know! You could get one of these: http://gadgets.boingboing.net/2008/06/13/500-ethernet-cable-a.html

    to go with it! Then your packets would get to your router much better, with more clarity. Cables matter, dude!
     
  19. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
  20. eideteker

    eideteker Who jarked off in my frakkin' coffee? OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,428
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    PA.
    Thanks for your feedback!
     
  21. OniMinion

    OniMinion ...recalls when this forum was actually about cars OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    4,894
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Indiana/Minnesota
    Well, I just got done reading through everyone's posts on Tom's Hardware regarding the Killer NIC. It seems that most users are very convinced that it was a promotional "advertisement" article, seeing as there was really no "benchmarking" and/or test process actually listed.

    As for the OTers that posted your latency is more than your computer and connection - I agree completley. You cannot ignore the fact that the server, and everything inbetween can have a dramatic effect on your gaming experience (e.g., ping). I can remember multiple times when a game would "hick-up" and my friend in California would experience it at the same time I would here in Minnesota on the same server. Of course we'd both be bitching at each other about it over the voice chat software.

    This product does bring up a valid point, when is the gaming industry going to address this? Also, FINAL note- some games have shitty code written for their online play (e.g., GTA IV and Battlefield 1942/2...) The best online code I can still remember was Half-Life with WON authentication servers, I could get pings in the 20's consistantly. I think the first place we have the point the finger is the software developors; however, good luck to them since the new games we are playing do SO MUCH MORE THAN old counter-strike ever had to...

    Shit, /rant
     
  22. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    ATTACK OF THE ZOMBIE THREAD! :hammer:
     

Share This Page