GUN I feel sorry for whoever buys this.

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by Aequitas, Sep 28, 2006.

  1. Aequitas

    Aequitas If it keeps on raining, levee's going to break.

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,406
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
  2. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    Lots of places sell those. Nothing wrong with selling them some people do have Class III AK's and need spares. Of course if you only have a semi auto rifle and buy those parts it could be considered conspiracy :noes:
     
  3. BigBadJohn

    BigBadJohn Pay-back time OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Kell, Illinois
    "We ARE NOT the ATF. lolz"
     
  4. striker754

    striker754 Chillin

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    16,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Around
    No. You need some modifications to your receiver. Such as a rail notch and an autosear hole. Else, anyone who has an AK kit and an AK is in violation, and thats not true
     
  5. [DWI]

    [DWI] Master of Nothing

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2000
    Messages:
    21,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    I know I mean they posted a picture of it why would anyone pay for it when they can make it themselves now . . .

    oh wait you meant the legal thing . . . I think the local army navy surplus place back home sells a how to book for that too.
     
  6. striker754

    striker754 Chillin

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    16,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Around
    :ugh:
     
  7. [DWI]

    [DWI] Master of Nothing

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2000
    Messages:
    21,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    :mamoru:

    I'm not quite that dumb
     
  8. Soybomb

    Soybomb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    Irrelevant, the ATF has tried to nail people to the wall just for having parts which when combined would result in a weapon they are prohibited from having. They call it constructive possession and while charges might not stick it would be a pain to deal with.

    Read 1992's US v. Thompson Arms for a good example of where such a thing was argued, and even successfully in 1 court.
     
  9. terrist

    terrist Cowboy President > All other World Leaders

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2006
    Messages:
    20,813
    Likes Received:
    0
    :noes:
     
  10. striker754

    striker754 Chillin

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2001
    Messages:
    16,198
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Around

    Tried but not successful. You bring up the Thompson Arms case which proves my point. The problem with the courts is consistancy. You have Thompson Arms which obviously shows that you can have a short barrel along with having a rifle. Then you have US v Kent where someone was busted with a short AR upper and having a rifle. Quite ridiculous if you ask me, to have 2 directly conflicting points. So much for proving intent

    Summary: The entire gun legislation world and the courts are fucked up and need change.
     
  11. Soybomb

    Soybomb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    I will quote the important part of my statement one more time ;)
     
  12. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    :werd: The charges may not stick but your still going to be out a shitload of money for legal fees and shit, there was a story I posted not to long ago where they charged the guy cause he had a manual on how to make a rifle he owned full auto, didnt convert it but they still charged him with conspiracy or some shit.
     

Share This Page