GUN heard this recently...

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by cabriolet, Jan 8, 2007.

  1. cabriolet

    cabriolet ...

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,761
    Likes Received:
    0
    they are not high capacity magazines, they are regular capacity magazines, the politicians want you to be forced to own reduced capacity magazines

    ibrepost
     
  2. mrbill

    mrbill New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cibolo,Tx
    welcome to 1994
     
  3. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    fixed :wavey:
     
  4. mrbill

    mrbill New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cibolo,Tx
    :rofl:
     
  5. Aequitas

    Aequitas If it keeps on raining, levee's going to break.

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,406
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    It's only logical. You would think a high capacity magazine would be more than the gun can normally hold. Anything below the number it normally holds is a restriction, not a norm.
     
  6. idleprocess

    idleprocess Bring a dollar with you baby in the cold cold grou

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,678
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    "world-class" to the brim Dallas
    Good point. The 17-round Glock 17 magazine is certainly operating within design capacity. The 33-round magazine that extends well beyond the handgrip seems more "high capacity" because you certainly have to make compromises to use it.
     

Share This Page