First Drive: 2005 Mercedes-Benz SLR

Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by TriShield, Jun 19, 2003.

  1. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    Bat Out-a-Hell Benz

    [​IMG]

    By D. John Booth
    Date Posted 06-12-2003

    Two hundred and forty kilometers an hour (or 150 mph) going into the 35-degree banked turn and I take one hand off the steering wheel to turn the air conditioning down to 16 degrees Celsius (61 F). Damn, it's hot in Barcelona. Isn't it supposed to mainly rain on the plain in Spain?

    Exit the 180-degree bend and punch it. The Mercedes' five-speed automatic tranny kicks down a gear, the revs pulse to 6,000 and we rocket ahead as if we're overtaking a trawling 18-wheeler. At 270 kilometers per hour (this early version of the SLR doesn't have "MPH" on its speedometer), I get really brave and take both hands from the steering wheel — admittedly, they remained a hair's breadth away, just in case anything went awry.

    Stupid, yes, but then I've never driven anything quite as stable at speed as this brand-new German supercar.

    Punch it again and the silver speedo needle swings to 300 km/h (out of a possible 360!) fast enough to make rumors of a 336 km/h (210 mph) top speed believable. Again, all with the unflappable calm of a sedate 60-mph crawl to the cottage on a Friday night. Cripes! Don't forget that we're supposedly taking things easy, as these are one-off prototypes.

    Forget everything you've read about Mercedes-Benz's new SLR. Ignore all the pictures that marginalize the original Vision SLR concept as a warmed-over SL500 with a few strategically placed scoops and flares. And pay no mind to your cousin Vinny, the family's resident, Camaro-owning car expert dismissing the SLR as little more than a puffed-up AMG-tuned Mercedes roadster with chrome wheels and a sticky set of tires.

    For, if there's one thing that's evident from the first glimpse of Mercedes' über supercar in the flesh (or carbon fiber, as it were), it is that the sleek-bodied SLR is every bit as exotic as Ferrari's unobtainable Enzo and Porsche's outrageous Carrera GT. In fact, badging it a Mercedes-Benz may be selling the SLR short. When the car is publicly unveiled for the first time in Frankfurt later this year, it will no doubt be the reported 600 horsepower (final figures are yet to be officially released), 591 pound-feet of torque or sub-four-second 0-to-60-mph time that will grab the skeptics' attention. But the heart of the car, the essence of what makes the SLR so very very special, is hidden deep beneath the hand-sanded monochromatic black and silver (the only colors initially available) bullet body styled by Peter Pfeiffer (senior vice-president of design) at Mercedes-Benz's design house.

    What you can't see (but what prospective owners can watch as it's assembled at McLaren's new Technology Center in Surrey, England) is a chassis only slightly removed from Formula One technology and arguably the most technologically advanced in the world. The entire superstructure is made of carbon fiber (with some pieces reinforced with polystyrene foam) bolted to an aluminum engine cradle so exquisitely cast it wouldn't look out of place in the Guggenheim. In turn, two carbon-fiber cones, designed much like the nose cones on McLaren's F1 racers, serve as the deformable crash barrier for the SLR's front bumper, absorbing four times as much energy as a normal car's steel crumple zone. More importantly, McLaren claims that the entire chassis is more than twice as strong as any Mercedes sedan and an incredible five times as rigid as the new SL500.

    [​IMG]

    What is evident, even in the heavily disguised preproduction prototypes we tested, is that the SLR owes little other than its grille-mounted three-pointed star and Stuttgart's trademark cat's eyes headlights to the garden-variety Mercedes roadster. Looking far more like a 575 Maranello than any SL of recent vintage (though there are styling touches, like the gullwing doors, dating back to the original of the mid-'50s), the SLR's hood is seemingly miles longer, the windshield much more dramatically raked back and its stubby cabin biased distinctly toward the rear with a Ferrari-esque high tail. That's because, while Mercedes mandated the SLR's front-engine layout, McLaren's chief engineer, Gordon Murray (he penned the BMW-powered McLaren F1, generally acknowledged as the fastest "production" car on the planet) favors midengine formats. The compromise was to move the driver rearward and place the engine aft of the front axle, literally under that radically sloping front windshield. Reportedly, Murray was after a 53/47 percent rearward weight bias, but had to settle for what other manufacturers would call an ideal 50/50 split.

    It makes no never mind, as the SLR is as stable as Appalachian granite. Though we were supposed to be limited to a conservative-for-mad-European-testers' 155 mph at IDIADA's humongous 7.5-kilometer banked oval just outside of Barcelona, more than a few scribes, including yours truly, tempted the ire of the Spanish security guards by throttling up to 185 mph. Even at those supralegal speeds, the SLR was as unperturbed by the Spanish tarmac's bumps, heaves and cracks as a normal car would be at 65.

    All of the credit goes to the aforementioned chassis, especially the F1-inspired flat-bottom tub, complete with inlet ducts and a rear diffuser that conspire to literally suck the SLR into the pavement with aerodynamic downforce
    . Antony Sheriff, managing director of McLaren Cars, also credits the SLR's adjustable rear spoiler. The 200-millimeter-wide rear panel lifts between 10 and 30 degrees during high-speed driving (though it automatically flips up to a steep 65 degrees to act as an air brake when emergency braking is called for) and is said to greatly enhance high-speed stability by increasing rear downforce and moving the aerodynamic center of pressure rearward. Such was the SLR's inherent ability that none of the assembled journalists could sense any difference with the spoiler in place or retracted. It must have been making a difference, though, because whenever one of the test cars sped by the pits with the foil up, its wake boomed far louder than SLRs passing with the spoiler down.

    It was a little harder to evaluate the SLR's cornering ability, however. The IDIADA skid pad, used for some basic slalom and cornering tests, was a low-friction surface, so final determinations of the SLR's cornering ability will have to wait.

    What can be gleaned is that the McLaren's all-independent, double-wishbone suspension is incredibly well balanced with just a hint of initial understeer easily turned into sportier oversteer with just a jab of the throttle. Mercedes' ESP stability control system is also a little more liberal in this guise, allowing more slip than is normal before applying the brakes to bring the car back into line. And unlike some other Mercs, it can be completely shut off.

    Surprisingly, the standard wheels are only 18-inchers, a far cry from the 20-inch monstrosities becoming almost normal on sports cars. Mercedes used them because they allowed the use of higher-profile tires (bespoke Michelins designed specifically for the SLR) for a better ride. After all, Mercedes' intention is that the SLR be a Gran Turismo in the flavor of Ferrari's 575 Maranello, even though its performance is closer to the no-holds-barred Enzo. Those wanting a little more from their SLR can opt for the lower-profile 295/30ZR-19 rears and 245/35ZR-19 fronts (the 18-inchers are the same width) mounted on even flashier wheels. Hidden from view are the massive carbon ceramic brake discs, sturdy enough to handle all the heat generated by the front eight-piston calipers trying to stop a car from the ridiculous speeds the SLR is capable of.

    The skid pad test was also designed to give us a taste of the AMG-tuned V8's acceleration. Power is massive thanks to the engine's supercharger, with abundant torque available right from idle. At high speeds, that outsized tri-star emblem in the grille turns out to serve a dual purpose (besides humbling drivers of lesser cars). It's hollowed out and serves as the high-speed ram-air inlet to the biggest intake plenum chamber I've ever seen. Acceleration from a standing start is as ferocious as one would expect, and though no official figures have been released, 3.8 seconds would be a good guess for the 0-to-60-mph time.

    It would be even quicker but for two Mercedes decisions. First, the company mandated that the SLR have a full complement of safety goodies (airbags, air curtains, traction control, SBC brake control, etc.). It also equipped the car with upscale interior accoutrements such as a navigation system, seven-speaker Bose audio system and a six-disc CD changer (located in the trunk) so Gordon Murray's initial projection of a 3,100-pound curb weight has ballooned somewhat. Though you may see other reports estimating the SLR at over 3,500 pounds, my best guess would be about 3,350, or just a bit more than the published reports for the Enzo.

    [​IMG]

    It's also Mercedes' doctrine that all its AMG-tuned engines be mated to automatic trannies, in this case a five-speed (the newly announced seven-speed couldn't handle all the torque). A six-speed manual would definitely make the SLR feel sportier and accelerate quicker. As it is, it is most assuredly the fastest thing with a slushbox. It's worth noting that the SLR does offer an automanual mode (gears are changed by levers on the backside of the steering wheel) and that the manual function offers three levels of shifting speed (and, therefore, severity). I'd guess that it will only be a matter of time before prospective customers whine enough for Mercedes to change its tune and offer a manual.

    I could only find one possible flaw in the SLR's performance. In truth, it's more a matter of personal taste than a fault. Nonetheless, it's worth noting that the SLR sounds like a big old American muscle car. From the outside, it reminds me of the way nifty side pipes pound out a traditional Motown basso profundo tune. Inside, the SLR sounds like a breathed-on Corvette.

    This is one exotic that is likely to turn on Johnny Six-Pack as much as Thurston Howell the III. On the other hand, it's entirely possible that those with almost half a million dollars (the only pricing Mercedes would officially commit to is "the $300,000 range") might expect something more akin to the howl of a high-revving V12 or the bark of a V10 for their post-tax cut glut of cash.

    Also, Mercedes may be confusing potential clients as to which of its super cars is truly its flagship. The company recently announced the introduction of its SL65. This AMG-tuned beast gets a 612-horsepower and 724-pound-foot version of the Mercedes' monster twin-turbo V12. Despite its greater output, the SL65 is unlikely to challenge the SLR in the speed and handling departments as it will be much heavier. Nonetheless, exactly why Mercedes wants to divert the hoopla from the SLR is an interesting question.

    Also open to question is the SLR's interior. Not because it's not up to snuff but because most of it was covered with felt, keeping what was obviously red leather trim away from prying eyes. What was evident is that the center console's styling is not unlike the Chrysler Crossfire's — but with far greater quality — it uses an all-aluminum finish. A horizontal lever in the middle controls the orientation of the rear spoiler/air brake. Two large rotary buttons are provided to control the automanual transmission's shifting programs and an SLR-badged door hides the audio and navigation system.

    [​IMG]

    Way nifty is the starter button hidden beneath a little flip-up door on the top of the gearshift lever. And in keeping with the race-car-for-the-street theme, instrumentation is sparse with the blue-hued speedo and tachometer dominating the IP. And, of course, there are the phenomenally easy-to-use gullwing doors — a key part of the SLR's heritage. One area that may cause prospective owners heartaches is seat adjustments. Currently, the twin buckets are adjustable fore and aft and the entire chair can be tilted as well. However, the seat back cannot be reclined vis-à-vis the seat bottom, meaning the angle between your legs and back is fixed. My lower lumbar found the angle just a little too acute. And, according to Sheriff, changing that angle is impossible since it would require re-crash testing the whole car. That said, McLaren will customize the seats with various thickness pads to suit various girths.

    Job one for the SLR is planned for November of this year with deliveries starting in early 2004. The company plans to make only 500 a year for seven years. Even at the incredibly steep price that McLaren's participation dictates, I expect there's going to be a waiting list for delivery of SLRs for years to come.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    OT would hate the SLR if it was an American car.

    It's ugly, $300k, uses a supercharger, is too heavy at 3,500lbs, only comes with an automatic transmission, is built by someone else for MB, and has "gay" paddles to shift gears on the wheel, what a gimmick!
     
  3. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX
    :cool: :cool: very nice.
     
  4. RenaultFreak

    RenaultFreak OMG

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2002
    Messages:
    88,686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CCS, VE
    some guy already has a replica :o
     
  5. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX
    :ugh: PMS?
     
  6. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    Double standard.
     
  7. nucl3ar

    nucl3ar Guest

  8. BLoG

    BLoG Scented Meat

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2001
    Messages:
    293,953
    Likes Received:
    2,982
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    :werd: * infinity
     
  9. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX
    Meh i respect all cars. But i certainly know what you mean.
     
  10. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    With that said, I like the SLR.

    It sounds like my kind of supercar, performance with luxury.
     
  11. RenaultFreak

    RenaultFreak OMG

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2002
    Messages:
    88,686
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CCS, VE
    I don't really care what OT thinks, hey I'm a Renault FREAK....

    and I like that BENZ A LOT!

    I'd be fucking happy even with a "girly" SLK.
     
  12. Dr. Woo

    Dr. Woo Guns don't kill people

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    31,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    1. Yeah, it's ugly.
    2. The Saleen S7 is more expensive and people don't talk bad about it.
    3. When's the last time MB used a turbocharger in a non-diesel engine?
    4. 3,500 is pretty damn good if you ask me.
    5. The Automatic is highly more advanced than any American company would come up with, but it should have a manual option anyway.
    6. If I had to choose a company to build a car for me, McLaren would be VERY high on my list.
    7. The paddles are definitely more convenient than having to reach down to shift.
     
  13. nucl3ar

    nucl3ar Guest

    I am guessing you missed the point of why he said all that. ;)
     
  14. Dr. Woo

    Dr. Woo Guns don't kill people

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2002
    Messages:
    31,237
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Virginia Beach
    I probably should have specified that I was speaking from an American perspective...

    IF IT WAS AMERICAN...

    Eh, whatever.
     
  15. Evidence.

    Evidence. Robot Rock

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2002
    Messages:
    81,261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    KS/OK
    ill take 2 :cool: :bowdown:
     
  16. psykosis

    psykosis Go placidly amid the noise and the haste

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2001
    Messages:
    123,781
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    Listing between sin and salvation
    I would fuck a running rhino for one of those. I would easily choose it over a Carerra GT, and probably an Enzo. I really think those are the only 2 cars in its league available here in the US. I'd also take it over a McLaren F1, though I'd probably take the new Bugatti over the SLR.

    I'll probably never have to worry about it though. Such is life...
     
  17. Red97GST

    Red97GST Guest

    i see what youre saying about the double standard. but if Ford had a supercar made by Mclaren, i dont think most people would bitch about it. people are willing to compromise performance more when they are in a M-B than when they are in a Ford/Chevy. Thats why people are willing to put up with a slushbox and smooth ride, because thats what MB's do well. If it were a ford, people would assume the level of luxury could not be in MB's/mclaren league, and would be focused on balls to the wall, which this car isnt quite.

    With that said, I think it sounds liek an awesome car, but I can't say taht i'd buy one for sure if i had the money. When I'm paying multiple 6 figures, styling is VERY important to me, and from the pics, it's not really my style.



    Dont get me wrong though, i'd fuck my uncle for that car

     
  18. MerkurMan

    MerkurMan Gimme Nuts, Bolts and 12 Volts

    Joined:
    May 27, 2001
    Messages:
    12,361
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Ontario
    Mother of Christ. That car is messing with my head. I WANT IT.

    And strangely, I find myself waiting.... for the first SLR crash pics when they're released. It always happens. :ugh: :eek3: Yes, I know, I need help.
     
  19. SickOfItAll

    SickOfItAll The Bartender

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2001
    Messages:
    65,513
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I don't think it's ugly - I'd take one in a heartbeat (though the Carrera GT is a little more my style, even though they're both far out of my league)
     
  20. M4A1

    M4A1 :)

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Messages:
    36,276
    Likes Received:
    0
    i hate to say it, but Trishield :repost:ed :o
     
  21. 80DGY

    80DGY Guest

    :werd:
     
  22. L7

    L7 Mr Negativity

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2001
    Messages:
    19,653
    Likes Received:
    0
    or talk about it at all for that matter.
     
  23. Read more...

    Read more... SPQR

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Messages:
    111,261
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Westbound

    2004 S600?
     
  24. o.negative

    o.negative OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2002
    Messages:
    24,875
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    STL -> NYC
    it looks pretty nice.... i dont know bout dem black graphics thoug ;)
     

Share This Page