First Drive: 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution

Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by TriShield, May 2, 2003.

  1. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    Kill the Radio and Drive

    [​IMG]
    The Evo gets the signature split grille, reinforced 2.5-mph bumpers and a set of HIDs. Underneath, a mechanical viscous coupling AWD system replaces the computer-controlled system available on the Evo VII.

    By Erin Riches
    Date posted: 02-14-2003

    We Americans live in tumultuous times, or so say the mainstream media outlets. On any given day, we're asked to consider the possibility of war abroad and the threat of terrorism, unemployment and adult obesity at home. Fortunately, if you're a driving enthusiast with a steady day job, a bountiful crop of affordable sports cars could provide a much needed distraction in 2003. We're not talking about econosport sedans or hot little hatchbacks, either, rather serious performance machines that aren't super cheap but can at least be had by those who don't pull down a six-figure salary. Candidates include the Nissan 350Z (and the six-speed Infiniti G35 Sport Coupe), Mazda RX-8 and the two rally car rivals, Mitsubishi's Lancer Evolution and Subaru's Impreza WRX STi.

    The 350Z and RX-8 are rekindlings of old flames (300ZX and RX-7) that were smothered by flagging sales and, in the Mazda's case, tightening emissions requirements in the mid-1990s. But unless you're an enthusiast, an automotive journalist and/or a hard-core gamer who's played all the racing titles on the video game consoles, you probably don't know much about the Lancer Evolution and WRX, all-wheel-drive cars that were built to do battle on the world rally circuit. Various iterations were sold in Japan and Europe but never in the United States until the current WRX arrived in 2001.

    And two years later, the 227-horsepower WRX remains an excellent buy. Compared with most other cars, it drives like a racecar. But this WRX makes compromises — the biggest of these being a suspension that's compliant enough for weekday commutes and an available automatic transmission — and that's why Subaru has sold so many of them. But there is a population of serious drivers who aren't willing to trade away a shred of performance for comfort (especially if the car in question isn't their primary transportation), and perhaps they're willing to pay a little more to get even more power. These are the people Mitsubishi hopes will buy the U.S.-spec Lancer Evolution.

    If you're a site regular, you know that we got a sneak preview of the Evo in the form of a 2002 German-spec Evolution VII GSR that we pitted against a completely stock WRX in a quick comparison test. We've acknowledged that this matchup was a bit unfair to the Subaru, which had neither the power nor the race-ready running gear to keep up with the Evo when traffic cleared out. But keep in mind that we weren't looking for a hard-and-fast winner; instead, we wanted to get an idea of where the eventual U.S. Evo would fall in the sports car world in terms of performance and day-to-day livability. After two days of intensive driving, we concluded that the Mitsubishi was far superior to the WRX in every measurable performance category but that it would be tough to take as a daily driver.

    The 2003 Evolution (just "Evolution," not "Evolution VIII" since the previous seven cars were never sold here) is still a sport sedan that makes very few compromises for the everyday grind. It's still based on the Lancer economy sedan, so dimensions are the same inside and out. It looks much the same as the Evolution VII as well, though its front fascia has been resculpted to include Mitsubishi's new corporate style, the split-grille with prominent nose and a stronger bumper that meets the 2.5-mph impact requirement in the U.S. Inlets remain numerous so that the intercooler gets as much fresh air as possible. Standard HID headlights allow the driver to look down the road at any time of day; taillights are of the clear-lens variety.

    A low-profile GT-type rear spoiler is supposed to come standard, but judging by the prototype examples at the press introduction, it's fair to say that Mitsubishi expects most buyers to go for the optional large, aggressive rear wing. The only other option initially available on the Evo will be a sunroof.

    Inside, the Evo looks much like the German-spec Evo VII and indeed the regular Lancer sedan. The control layout is user-friendly, but liberal use of hard plastic gives away its economy origins. At least it's all put together solidly. Mitsubishi did make one change to the cabin that we noticed right away: The body-hugging Recaro seats have been widened to accommodate bigger North American butts. This extra seat room, along with the '03 Evo's larger gas tank (14 gallons as opposed to 12.7), should make the car much more tolerable as a daily driver.

    [​IMG]
    The interior isn't much to behold, but it's functional enough for serious driving.

    Mechanically, little has changed in the transition from the Evolution VII. The computer-controlled Active Center Differential with driver-selectable terrain settings didn't make it to the U.S. production car, but only the most advanced drivers are apt to find fault with the less sophisticated viscous coupling unit. Under ideal traction conditions, the front/rear torque split is 50/50, and the ratio is automatically adjusted when slippage occurs. A limited-slip rear differential is standard.

    The U.S. Evo's turbocharged 2.0-liter inline four is rated for a bit less horsepower and torque — 271 hp at 6,500 rpm and 273 at 3,500 rpm versus 276 and 283, respectively, at the same rpm — but our initial driving impressions suggest that the engine continues to pull hard at just about any speed. Of course, with redline falling at 7,000 on the 9,000-rpm tach, it definitely wants to rev, and power comes on strong near the top end. Mitsubishi is promising acceleration times on par with the 5.3-second 0-to-60 and 13.8-second quarter-mile we got out of the Evo VII. So despite the differences on paper, drivers won't lose out in the real world.

    A five-speed manual will be the sole transmission choice on the Evo. Gearing is identical to that of the Evo VII's, though the first and second gears have been fitted with an additional synchro each for smoother engagement and better feel during high-speed shifts, as well as greater durability.

    Other hardware carries over directly, including the large Brembo brakes (12.7-inch rotors in front, 11.8 inches in back), lightweight 17-inch Enkei wheels and specially designed Yokohama Advan A046 tires, sized 235/45WR17. Mitsubishi even threw in the water sprayer that automatically gives the intercooler a spritz during high operating temperatures. A competition-oriented Sports ABS system incorporates sensors that measure steering wheel angle, wheel speed and lateral and longitudinal G-forces to regulate the braking force applied to each wheel. The idea is to give the driver more control when entering a turn on a road course or his favorite twisty two-lane. Electronic Brakeforce Distribution is also part of the deal.

    Our initial opportunity to drive the Evolution on a road course proved all too brief, but enjoyable nonetheless. As we noted in our comparison test, the steering is ultraquick — few cars on the market can match this kind of response and it took a few laps before we felt comfortable with it. Road feel through the wheel was superb, perfectly communicating how our actions in the cockpit were affecting the tires.

    Around turns, the firm suspension (struts in the front, a multilink-modified wishbone design in the rear) did all the work, yielding flat body attitude and perfect balance when exiting turns. Meanwhile, the tires offered progressive levels of howl, such that we knew well in advance when we were approaching the breakaway point.

    Good as the Evo is, your confidence when driving it on a track (or a public road) has much to do with your own skill. Less experienced drivers who buy this car should strongly consider a performance driving course in order to get the most fun possible out of their purchase.

    Although Mitsubishi has invested a great deal of importance into the Evo's arrival in the U.S., the company's first-year sales estimate is modest — just 6,500 units to a 90-percent male, enthusiast-oriented customer base. The company hopes that the very existence of the car will motivate the less inclined (in terms of performance driving or monetary resources) to consider other models in the lineup, particularly the standard Lancer. (And with the introduction of the 160-hp '04 Lancer Ralliart at the 2003 Chicago Auto Show, Mitsubishi has potentially given cash-strapped enthusiasts a reasonable alternative.)

    Now that everyone knows the WRX STi will feed off a larger-displacement 300-hp motor, those who have put down a deposit for an Evo may be having second thoughts. And since we haven't driven this STi yet, we can't tell you which way to go. A few things to keep in mind, though: 1) The Evo is a fantastic car in its own right; 2) the Mitsu should be the less expensive route for enthusiasts. It starts at $28,987, while the STi's larger engine and computer-controlled AWD system will probably command a base MSRP upwards of $30,000.

    Three? If you can hold off on your purchase for a few months, we'll put ourselves through the agony of an Evo-versus-STi rematch. After we recover, we'll tell you which of these street-legal rally cars most deserves a spot in your driveway.

    [​IMG]
    The large carbon-fiber-reinforced rear wing is optional, but we expect that few Evos will be seen without it.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX
  3. Ben

    Ben Guest

  4. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    It's a little cheaper than the STi, it looks like it's just a little less powerful and a little slower as well.

    Which one will really be king of the hill, and of sales?

    We'll have to wait and see. :cool:
     
  5. dbman96

    dbman96 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2000
    Messages:
    49,996
    Likes Received:
    6
    God that car gets uglier every time I see it.
     
  6. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX
    I would take the EVo over the STI and replace the taillights.
     
  7. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,732
    Likes Received:
    1,596
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    Mitsubishi Vs. Subaru

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    [​IMG] [​IMG]

    A battle of epic Ford Vs. Chevrolet proportions... :big grin:
     
  8. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX

    Yup, by the end of this years its gonna start getting really ugly.


    Glad im on the EVOs side. :fawk:
     
  9. hoabegrubn

    hoabegrubn Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2001
    Messages:
    2,098
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. dbman96

    dbman96 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2000
    Messages:
    49,996
    Likes Received:
    6
    I HATE to think that I've bought my way into the Pony Car battle of the decade.

    Impreza = V6 Camaro
    WRX = Z28
    STi = SS

    Lancer = V6 Mustang
    EVO = GT? Cobra?

    We'll soon find out.
     
  11. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX

    what did you buy?
     
  12. dbman96

    dbman96 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2000
    Messages:
    49,996
    Likes Received:
    6
    Always good to pick sides before the competition even gets here.

    Oh, and I bought a 'regular' WRX. Because I wanted a wagon. :bigthumb:
     
  13. ZAQ786

    ZAQ786 BMW: The reason Lexus is still 'In the pursuit of

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2000
    Messages:
    33,124
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    HOUSTON, TX

    :cool: see you in my rearview mirror :o :o :o
     
  14. dbman96

    dbman96 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2000
    Messages:
    49,996
    Likes Received:
    6
    Didn't buy it to race people from stoplights. Enjoy the view in the mirror, I'll be averting my eyes trying to find something more pleasant to look at. :fawk:


    I really do have a great deal of respect for both cars. But if I was dropping 30 large instead of 22, I would have picked the STi.
    :bigthumb:
     
  15. Sonic

    Sonic Live every day to the fullest, for yesterday is go

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    48,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Westchester County,New York
    I hope that both the taillights and wing are delete options.

    Oh, and Mitsu is coming out with a 170 HP Rallisport edition Lancer for those that don't want to buy a 28K Mitsu, but still want something with some power.
     
  16. ahhhhh i dunno which one i want :wtc:

    when are the sti's comin into town?
     
  17. dmora

    dmora Guest

    US auto reviews are ususally biased and worthless when compared to UK ones. Regardless, i'd like to see what happens with the STi.
     
  18. LEGbEND

    LEGbEND .

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2001
    Messages:
    23,270
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Shitcago
    theres no strut tower brace on the sti?

    whats more functional, fmic or tmic?
     
  19. Sonic

    Sonic Live every day to the fullest, for yesterday is go

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2001
    Messages:
    48,083
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Westchester County,New York
    Good fucking luck getting an STi, they are only releasing 300 a month to the US market.:greddy:
     
  20. Jackie Treehorn

    Jackie Treehorn Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Messages:
    23,688
    Likes Received:
    0

    I'd take the STI over the EVO personally, but as far as sales I think the EVO is going to win simply because Subaru isn't shipping many STI's to North America :(

    I don't know the exact numbers, but from what I've heard the STI is going to be very limited, which is gay.
     
  21. Buck-O

    Buck-O Guest

    Its to bad the UK will get the much more powerful and refined EJ20 version of the STi. And they will also be able to get LHD JDM EVO-VIII's through black market for little more then their domestic european EVO-VIII's will run. And even then, their EVO-VIII's will not had the 2.5MPH bumpers, or the orther rediculas stuff the US Version does.

    A trust brace on an STi isnt really as neccasary. The chassis design makes the front end really rigid...inpart to the engines low setting int he engine bay, which allows for more unibody braces longitudinally down the chasis. As well, the fire wall is also laterally strengthened with unibody braces (i.e. W shapped, stamped pieces of metal welded into the uniboy making it look as one whole piece). Plus Subaru's chronicly understeers. Stiffening up the front end only makes that probibly worse. So in the name of heavy turn in, they brace was proibly left off.

    As for efficiency, FMIC will alwyas be more efficent. It will have more direct acces to clean, unturbulant air, and have better flow through to disipate the heat. On a TMIC you are struggling to get clean air over the top of the hood, then it has to go through a small opening to get to the intercooler, and then it has alof of "stuff" in the way to escape. And more often then not, the heat gets trapped under the hood and in the engine compartment, adding heavily to another problem...heat soak. As the engine and turbo get hotter, the heat will eventially wick off, and get trapped under the hood. Physics being what they are, if the intercooler is of a lower temperature, the heat will soak into it, reducing the efficiency of the intercooler. The one benefit of a TMIC over an FMIC is th eamount of piping required, and the parasitic loss that happens from moving air through a long length of piping. But the heat soak problems (especially if your in traffic or daily driving), are enough to outweigh the benefits of a TMIC in air efficiency.

    So overall FMIC, for pure performance, is the better, and more efficient option.
     
  22. Scream_Phoenix

    Scream_Phoenix Handsome Boy Model

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    45,119
    Likes Received:
    158
    Location:
    Capital City
    horizontal mount > *
     

Share This Page