Edmunds Full-Test - 2007 Ford Edge AWD

Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by TriShield, Mar 19, 2007.

  1. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,822
    Likes Received:
    1,753
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    Stranded at the crossover crossroads

    [​IMG]
    Our $36,360 SEL Plus AWD model included navigation/upgraded audio, Sirius Satellite Radio, Vista Roof, premium wheels/tires and reverse sensors.

    By Chris Walton, Chief Road Test Editor

    3.5-liter 265-hp V6 - 6-speed automatic - All-wheel drive - $36,360 as-tested price

    On its face, and it's a big face, the 2007 Ford Edge has all the makings of a competitive crossover-utility vehicle, or CUV: rigid unit-body construction, ample 265-horsepower V6, all-wheel drive, cutting-edge styling (sorry) and room for five plus some luggage. It drives smoothly and quietly, and additional amenities include optional sat-nav, upgraded audio, rear-seat entertainment and a monster-sized power-sliding glass roof. So what's the problem?

    Our loaded Edge carried a $36,360 as-tested price. Granted our tester was packing the top-tier SEL Plus AWD trim level, but even staffers enamored by the Edge took one look at that number and spontaneously blurted out something like, "Well that changes everything."

    The fact is you get a comparable Honda Pilot EX-L AWD or Toyota Highlander Limited AWD (both with a third-row) for less than that. Even a Cadillac SRX V6 comes in at $37,665. Each staffer had his/her own list of vehicles he/she'd rather spend that kind of cash on. Sometimes they overlapped.

    Buck Rogers, your transportation pod is ready

    [​IMG]
    With its high beltline, large grille and headlamp elements, the Edge hides its size well with clever proportioning.

    Draped in a retro-futurist wrapper, looking like an inflated Ford Fusion with a massive three-slat bumper-car grille, the five-passenger 2007 Ford Edge is a cleverly styled vehicle that conceals its true size well. At about 8 inches shorter than a Ford Explorer in length, 6 inches fewer in height, but more than 2 inches wider, the Edge casts a pretty big shadow in traffic. We were surprised to look eye-to-eye with and take up as much lane width as Jeep Grand Cherokees and Ford Explorers.

    Because of that big footprint and not offering a third row by design, second-row passengers will enjoy nearly the same leg- and headroom dimensions as the front row. Be that as it may, getting in and out of the Edge's rear doors is challenging because the doors don't open very wide and the rear wheel arches encroach on the small opening.

    While those rear seats do recline to a large degree and fold forward effortlessly with the pull of a single lever (or push of a button in the cargo bay), the price is that the articulating seats themselves are not all that comfortable. The seat bottoms lack contour and sufficient cushion to accommodate that near flat-folding feat. When stowed, the cargo area grows from a modest 32 cubic feet to an equally modest 70 cubic feet. For perspective, a 2007 Hyundai Santa Fe's comparable cargo dimensions are 34.2 and 78.2 cubic feet, respectively.

    Style without substance

    [​IMG]
    Cool and contemporary, the Edge's interior looks better than it feels or operates.

    Up front, the unipod dashboard is styled conservatively but handsomely. Our tester featured the Medium Light Stone Leather treatment that unfortunately extends to the top of the dash pad, reflecting the light color perceptively in the windshield. The optional navigation system/Audiophile stereo is relatively easy to use (fingerprints notwithstanding), but the touchscreen, despite being placed high on the console for easy reference, is rather small.

    The driving position is good with ample height adjustment available (no power pedals, though), but why is the seatback angle adjusted with a manual lever? Overall, most staffers thought the interior's appearance was better than the insubstantial tactile feel and material choices that provide the look. Are you detecting a theme yet?

    Ride without handling

    [​IMG]
    Chrome-plated 18-by-7.5-inch wheels with 245/60R18 Continental CrossContact LX all-season tires are a $750 option.

    We've already mentioned the superb ride qualities of the Edge's suspension tuning, so it was time to put it to the test at the track. In our slalom test, we were pleased with the confident and weighty steering, how well the Edge responded to input, and decent grip supplied by the optional 18-inch tire package. But in the end, it was the non-defeat stability system (and much touted Roll Stability Control) whose constant vigilance put a 58.9-mph cap on the handling prowess. Like a high school dance chaperone on high alert for lascivious behavior, the stability system would put the brakes on just when we started getting aroused by the Edge's moves.

    It's useless to ask the Edge to use its MacPherson strut/multilink suspension and viscous-coupling AWD system to enhance its performance; the latter is there to get you out of a muddy ditch. Even on the constant-radius skid pad, the Edge orbited the circle obediently but modestly, earning a 0.73g lateral acceleration figure despite the 9.6-inch-wide Continental tires. And when we parked the Edge, that hefty steering feel we liked so much in dynamic testing didn't lighten up much. Some might find the effort required to turn the wheel at a standstill rather difficult.

    Power without motivation

    [​IMG]
    No fancy cover here. Ford's new 3.5-liter DOHC V6 makes a competitive 265 hp and a modest 250 lb-ft of torque.

    So how about that zingy, new 265-hp DOHC V6 and slick six-speed automatic? On paper it delivers with modern attributes such as all-aluminum construction, dual-plenum intake, variable intake-valve timing and a 6,700-rpm redline. Four-valve double-cam designs don't usually offer much low-end torque, and at 250 pound-feet at 4,500 rpm, the new 3.5-liter engine is no exception.

    With obviously advantageous 1st and 2nd gear ratios, the Edge launches and accelerates smartly, but the thrill is gone by the time 60 mph is reached in 8.3 seconds. The quarter-mile is covered in a noisy 16.3 seconds at 85 mph.

    The six-cog transmission is a step in the right direction; however, without a manual mode and with just two positions ("D" and "L") from which to select, the shift logic is left to the engineers who programmed it. For the most part, we have few complaints with shift timing and strategy, but it does seem to "want" to be in as high a gear as is mechanically possible.

    Curious to see what would occur if we selected "L" at freeway speeds, we pulled the lever back a notch only to have the revs rocket up over 6,000 rpm. The Edge hadn't downshifted one or two gears, but several; perhaps from 6th to 2nd gear. Instead, pressing the overdrive-off button offered only a slight amount of throttle control and engine braking. Whatever logic is used in this transmission is beyond our limited brain capacity.

    Heavy duty

    [​IMG]
    No third row means the Edge may carry a modest total of 70 cubic feet of cargo.

    The Edge is fitted with four-wheel disc brakes and four-channel ABS. The problem is the brakes are not ventilated and need to slow some 4,500 pounds of hurtling metal. The result was a hair-raising 152-foot stop from 60 mph. To put that uninspiring distance into perspective, the 7,550-pound Ford F-350 Super Duty 4x4 recorded a 142-foot stop in a recent heavy-duty truck comparison test. Obviously, Ford will need to address this shortcoming soon.

    Have a look at this recent comparison test of small all-wheel-drive SUVs for the dynamic neighborhood Ford ought to be in with the Edge. As it now stands, the Edge is barely better (and sometimes worse) than the hulking SUVs it is supposed to replace. The Edge's porkiness also affected our observed fuel economy. The Edge SEL AWD is rated at an estimated 17 mpg city and 24 mpg highway, but our observed, combined economy figure came in at a V8-like 14.7 mpg over 714.5 total miles. Swilling liquefied dinosaurs at this rate is hardly a selling point.

    At a crossroads

    [​IMG]
    With the optional navigation system, the Edge's Audiophile stereo has many useful features and is easy to operate. We'd like to see a bigger display screen, though.

    We began this test with high hopes from the handsome newcomer. Ford needs this vehicle. Ford wants you to want this vehicle. But it's hard to make a compelling argument for the Edge when compared to traditionally styled stalwarts like the Honda Pilot, Toyota Highlander, or even Ford's own Explorer. Size, price and capabilities of the Edge are, at best, on par with those vehicles.

    It gets even harder to defend the Edge when it's compared to the Hyundai Santa Fe, Mazda CX-7 or Toyota RAV4. Each is less expensive, more fun to drive and generally more fuel-efficient.

    Although we like Ford's newest crossover, the edgiest thing about it turns out to be its name.

    [​IMG]

    MSRP of Test Vehicle: $36,360

    What Works:
    Exceptionally good ride characteristics, unique exterior styling in a crowded crossover market, solid feel throughout.

    What Needs Work:
    Increased brake capabilities and/or weight reduction, gear selector needs more positions or manual function, pricing might be optimistic.

    Bottom Line:
    The price might be hard to foist on sophisticated buyers who know what else is out there, but the Edge offers a new and reasonably useful package.


    Second Opinion

    [​IMG]

    Edmunds.com Editor in Chief Karl Brauer says:
    This car is a tremendously important vehicle for Ford, as it is essentially the only "all-new" model it's got in the hopper for the next few years. As such, it better be good, right?

    Well, it looks "good," it drives "good" and it has a "good" interior (comfortable, roomy and attractive). The bulk of the interior panels are hard and plasticky, which is "acceptable" at $26,000 but "unacceptable" at the $36,000 our test car cost. The braking distance from 60 is another "unacceptable" feature (over 150 feet?!), but it's feasible that our test car's performance wasn't indicative of the entire product run.

    As for ergonomic design, I had two major issues with the Edge. First, no tuning knob on the upgraded audio system. Instead it's all buttons except for volume. Second, the transmission only offers two forward positions for the shifter — "D" and "L" — just like in the Fusion. I can deal with the audio issue because the system sounds quite good and the steering wheel controls are extensive. But the tranny design simply annoys me. Once again, I just paid $36,000 and I can't control the transmission? I tried the shifter in the "L" position and it actually did a passable job of holding gears on a twisty road. But it was still deciding for me how long to hold gears. Ultimately this won't matter to the majority of buyers who just put their crossovers in "D" and never look back. But this car is supposed to be Ford's savior. Where's my "manual-shift" mode?

    So that leaves us with three "goods," one "acceptable," one "passable," two "unacceptables" and one "annoyed." My math is a little fuzzy, but I don't know if that averages out to an overall "good" rating.

    Managing Editor Donna DeRosa says:
    If you read our long-term blog, you've heard me mention my favorite valet at a particular restaurant in Beverly Hills who also happens to be a car enthusiast. As I pull up weekly in a different car, he gives me his opinion. This is a man who sees a lot of cars, and working in Beverly Hills, he sees a lot of premium automobiles. When I pulled curbside in the new Ford Edge, he asked if it was a new Lexus. Now, it was dark and he didn't have a chance to see the badge on the front, but he had a point; the Edge is attractive enough to be mistaken for a more luxurious vehicle. Its crossover dimensions are more European than a traditional Ford, and its carbon-colored paint gives an elegant gloss to its exterior.

    The luxury comparison ends, however, when you open the door. Despite having leather-trimmed seats, and a center console spiffed up with the optional navigation system, the rest of the interior is outfitted with hard plastic pieces. The cabin was fairly quiet and the seating position was comfortable with heated seats that worked quickly and maintained a steady toastiness. But the 3.5-liter V6 engine got whiny when pushed above 40 mph and I had to give myself a lot of stopping distance to feel confident in its braking ability. Body lean was pronounced even when just turning a corner from a red light. Overall, it was a fairly nice vehicle, but why not go all the way and offer a complete package?

    Specs & Performance

    [​IMG]

    Model Year: 2007
    Make: Ford
    Model: Edge
    Style: SEL Plus 4dr SUV AWD (3.5L 6cyl 6A)
    Base Price: $31,395
    Price as Tested: $36,360
    Drive Type: all-wheel drive
    Transmission Type: 6-speed Automatic
    Displacement (liters): 3.5L (3496 cc)
    Engine Type: V6
    Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 265 @ 6250
    Torque (ft-lbs @ rpm): 250 @ 4500

    Braking System: front disc - rear disc
    Steering System: power steering
    Suspension Type (front): Independent, MacPherson Struts, Coil Springs, and Stabilizer Bar
    Suspension Type (rear): Independent, multilink, coil springs, and stabilizer bar
    Tire Size (front): P245/60R18 104T
    Tire Size (rear): P245/60R18 104T
    Tire Brand: Continental
    Tire Model: CrossContact LX M+S (all season)
    Curb Weight (lbs): 4,282 mfr (4530 as tested)
    Recommended Fuel: regular unleaded
    Fuel Tank Capacity (gal): 20
    EPA Fuel Economy (mpg): 17 City 24 Highway
    Edmunds Observed (mpg): 14.7

    Performance
    0 - 30 (sec): 2.8
    0 - 45 (sec): 5.2
    0 - 60 (sec): 8.3
    0 - 75 (sec): 12.9
    1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 16.3 @ 84.8
    30 - 0 (ft): 39
    60 - 0 (ft): 152
    Braking Rating (Excellent, Good, Average, Poor or Very Poor): Poor
    Slalom (mph): 58.9
    Skid Pad (g-force): 0.73
    Handling Rating (Excellent, Good, Average, Poor or Very Poor): Good

    Db @ Idle: 47.1
    Db @ Full Throttle: 72.9
    Db @ 70 mph Cruise: 68.1

    Acceleration: While the Edge feels heavy from a standstill, the gearing obviously helps it get off the line smartly. Gearshifts at wide-open throttle are quick, but the engine sounds rather unhappy in the upper revs. Shifting occurs before the 6700-rpm redline.

    Braking: Whoa, Nelly! The pedal feels firm and linear, however, the Edge needs bigger and/or better brakes. At over 150 feet to stop from 60 mph, the Edge is in Hummer H2 territory when it finally comes to a stop.

    Handling: In the skid pad, I couldn't detect any shifting of engine power fore/aft in the AWD system. Ultimately, understeer and non-defeat stability control limits performance. In the slalom, the same electronic limits keep the Edge from performing better. Just as the suspension begins working hard, the roll stability system begins applying brakes selectively. Still, it feels stable and relatively entertaining with appropriately weighted steering and good vehicle balance.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,822
    Likes Received:
    1,753
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
  3. Bona Fide

    Bona Fide Guest

    Seems like a vehicle of contradictions.
     
  4. Eigervue

    Eigervue New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,678
    Likes Received:
    0
    it's ok, not being able to stop means you like to live on the edge
     
  5. Ivy Mike

    Ivy Mike New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2002
    Messages:
    119,226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    yep, its a [​IMG]
     
  6. MAD PUNK inDC

    MAD PUNK inDC Sic Semper Tyrannis

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2000
    Messages:
    86,393
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    the machine
    Saturn Outlook > Ford pos.
     
  7. WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot

    WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2003
    Messages:
    19,991
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Ford is at least trying.

    I am just not a fan of 99% of the SUV/CUV/SAV's on the market.
     
  8. nuclear

    nuclear OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Messages:
    283,199
    Likes Received:
    1,270
    Have seen them on the road, doesn't look bad for its purpose, but too expensive.
     
  9. chicken strips

    chicken strips wut

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    7,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vegas
    who the hell buys a $36K FORD?
     
  10. Jake!

    Jake! Guest

    :eek3: My '86 Z-28 gets better mileage!
     
  11. stradivarius

    stradivarius OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    22,933
    Likes Received:
    144
    Location:
    North AUGUSTA.. South Carolina, son
    Maybe a truck but not that ugly POS
     
  12. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,822
    Likes Received:
    1,753
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    AutoWeek's long-term 380hp 2007 GMC Yukon Denali XL averages better than that at 16.6mpg. :rofl:
     
  13. Bernout

    Bernout OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2002
    Messages:
    20,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    LOL!

    Why Ford, can't you simply give us a good product? EVERYONE ELSE CAN!!
     
  14. Bernout

    Bernout OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2002
    Messages:
    20,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    My old 480hp Supra did not :o
     
  15. CalSpeedRacer

    CalSpeedRacer i lurk

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2001
    Messages:
    3,852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    sf
    i could name 10 suv's/cuv's $30k that would eat the edge for lunch. however, my guess is that you'll be able to pick up a $35k edge for less than $30k and maybe even closer to $25k in the near future. at that price, it may be competitive.

    poor poor ford...
     
  16. Jake!

    Jake! Guest

    our fleet @ work averages 4.5mpg :run:
     
  17. SQLee

    SQLee The OTer That Cares™

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    25,907
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I really like the looks and whole idea of the Edge, but if Ford didn't deliver... :nono:
     
  18. krott5333

    krott5333 Guest

    damn, it looks like a sweet ride too..

    I shouldve known it would be a POS, being a Ford and all...
     
  19. dirteemac

    dirteemac hey, how are you?

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2001
    Messages:
    7,776
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'll keep my forester xt.
     
  20. Slappy3243

    Slappy3243 Ello?

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2003
    Messages:
    16,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    VA
    That sucks. I kind of like how the edge looks :hs:
     
  21. krott5333

    krott5333 Guest

    Lexus RX330 > all that shit
     
  22. krott5333

    krott5333 Guest

    fuck yeah, its a hot ride, i walked out in the street in front of one just so it would stop and I could look at it :mamoru2:
     
  23. glide

    glide primer

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2002
    Messages:
    39,138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Berkeley, CA / San Diego, CA
    152' 60-0 :ugh:!
     
  24. Mitchj

    Mitchj OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    112,087
    Likes Received:
    81
    You guys need the Ford Territory Turbo.
     
  25. Mitchj

    Mitchj OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    112,087
    Likes Received:
    81
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    360 horsepower / 405lb/ft.
     

Share This Page