Detroit - It's Time to Pull the Plug on NASCAR.

Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by TriShield, Jul 8, 2004.

  1. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,775
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    [​IMG] by Peter M. DeLorenzo (ISSUE 255, JULY 7, 2004)

    [​IMG]

    Editor's Note: In the last five years of bringing you The High-Octane Truth, Peter has written countless columns that have reverberated and resonated through the halls of what's left of the "Big Three" - and, indeed, throughout the industry - but few have generated the torrent of email as last week's column about Detroit's misguided fascination with all things NASCAR. With that in mind, and with many auto executives on vacation over the next two weeks, we thought we'd leave the column up another week. - JJP

    Since starting this website five years ago, I've built a reputation by 1. Talking about things people in the business are usually only comfortable with discussing in private conversations or after hours, 2. Talking about things that executives are only willing to discuss with journalists "off the record," or in "deep background" conversations, and 3. Talking about things that others haven't even thought about yet, which inevitably become topics of the moment in the business, thanks to us. In short, creating Autoextremist.com and writing The High-Octane Truth every week has become about leading the discussions crucial to the industry, it's about being out front, and in some cases, it's about saying things people don't want to hear, but who, in private moments, admit are unflinchingly accurate, albeit as painful as that may be.

    With that reminder, today I'm going to lead the discussion on why Detroit's infatuation with all things NASCAR needs to come to an end. On the surface, this might be about as popular as suggesting that mom and apple pie have outlived their usefulness, but the reality is that NASCAR has become counterproductive to "Detroit" - and its cumulative and urgent interest in stemming the import tide, and it desperate mission to stop the erosion of market share in the North American market.

    Heresy? In some circles, you bet.

    But there is a growing belief in executive suites around the Motor City that NASCAR has outlived its usefulness, which is a tough stand to take, especially when you look at all that comes with NASCAR in its current form. It's the No. 2 spectator sport in the U.S. behind the National Football League. Its weekly races generate the kind of consistent viewing numbers that make Madison Avenue media mavens grin with a "cha-ching" soundtrack dancing in their heads. And NASCAR has exploited every opportunity to orchestrate a monster multi-billion dollar marketing juggernaut that has sponsors clamoring for a piece of the action (well, it used to, anyway. Lately, NASCAR has been in the throes of an actual sponsor exodus, as companies have found out that participating in NASCAR is all about promoting the NASCAR brand and little else).

    But what does that really mean to Detroit? What does NASCAR actually have to do with helping Detroit in its quest to hold market share - or even increase it? DaimlerChrysler, Ford and General Motors spend $75 million each on their NASCAR programs. That includes direct payouts to teams, drivers, promotions and advertising support. What, exactly, does Detroit get for its money?

    In a few words? Not a damn thing.

    First of all, NASCAR has created a cult of personality based on its drivers (and their car numbers) and their teams. The drivers are the first priority for NASCAR's marketing machine, and they've been extremely successful creating this cult of personality - based on the number of TV commercials, print ads and promotions that we see with NASCAR drivers involved.

    Second, NASCAR has created a marketing environment for its participating sponsors second only to the NFL in both its effectiveness and in the pampering way they treat their sponsor representatives at the events (which helps mask the fact that the sponsors are putting more into furthering NASCAR's interests than they are getting a return for their investments).

    Third, NASCAR has created a marketing vehicle only loosely based on the actual racing. Instead, it's all about "the show" - and NASCAR does everything in its power to enhance that show - with sponsors, the car companies and especially the fans taking a backseat to NASCAR's "vision" for what constitutes entertainment.

    What does that last point mean, exactly?

    It means that NASCAR has taken gradual steps over the last decade to equalize the competition, figuring that if "the show" has as close to a boffo ending every week that they can possibly orchestrate, then the TV numbers will stay up, and the whole machine can get fueled for even more sponsor participation - i.e., even more money.

    But in their zeal to orchestrate "the show" - NASCAR has proceeded to make Detroit's participation irrelevant. The cars, masquerading as the Dodge Intrepid, Ford Taurus and Chevrolet Monte Carlo, are now defined by "headlights" and grille openings created by different decals, and if you squint real hard they look like the cars' street counterparts (sort of), but in fact, the car bodies are identical, with heavy restrictions due to aerodynamic controls and the quest to "equalize" the competition. Not to mention the fact that the cars populate rental car fleets across America and are completely useless in Detroit's fight in staving off their import competitors.

    What is Detroit getting, exactly, from their involvement in NASCAR?

    I'll reiterate an earlier point, only this time with an assist from the late, great R&B singer Edwin Starr - absolutely nothing.

    The NASCAR marketing machine is in place to do one thing: Promote, enhance and expand the NASCAR brand. Period.

    They use their drivers to create a "cult of personality" in order to orchestrate and perpetuate that mission.

    And they use their sponsors in the same way.

    In a now annoying ritual, NASCAR drivers, in a typical post-race Victory Lane interview, first thank their car sponsors in an endless regurgitation of a laundry list memorized for the occasion, then they thank NEXTEL, the series sponsor, then they thank the sponsor of the actual event itself. If Dodge, Ford or Chevrolet is mentioned, it's in a brief throwaway line that inevitably gets lost in the shuffle.

    Detroit's participation, in short, has become an afterthought.

    NASCAR makes no bones about the fact that it believes it can get along just fine without Detroit, either. Moving closer to even more of a "spec car" series in the interest of "the show," NASCAR is contemplating building the center sections of the cars and only allowing teams to finish them off for their particular "brands" at their shops - all in the interest of making the cars as identical as possible. NASCAR has even discussed making and selling "spec" engines that remove any chance for a manufacturer to exploit any engineering advantage discovered. Heaven forbid a manufacturer be actually encouraged to use racing for what it has always been used for - to push the envelope, to innovate and to explore new technologies that end up improving production cars that we can all enjoy on the street.

    Detroit is wasting a cumulative $225 million on NASCAR. And wasting is the operative and dead-accurate word to use here. Here they are locked in the fight of their lives, literally for their very survival - and they're pissing away a quarter of a billion dollars every year to advertise their rental car fleets and help fuel NASCAR's marketing machine.

    What Detroit is doing in NASCAR has nothing to do with racing - instead, it has everything to do with perpetuating the NASCAR brand and enhancing "the show." And for those very crucial reasons, Detroit is being classically underserved in its interests.

    There are several other viable racing series in this country that allow Detroit to actually go head-to-head with the same import competition that they face in the showrooms every day. Those venues, like the SPEED World Challenge and the American Le Mans Series, offer import-oriented consumers a real opportunity to see Detroit products in action, and they can do wonders for Detroit's credibility. When Detroit can't even get on most import buyers' radar screens, they've got to go out of their way to do everything possible to change that - and pissing away millions on NASCAR's glorified branding exercise isn't going to cut it.

    The perpetual problem in Detroit is that nobody high up enough in these companies has the cojones to say "no" to NASCAR. Their marketing minions trot out the usual TV numbers and sponsor mumbo-jumbo, but nobody has the guts to ask the tough questions, such as - what are we selling here? And what are we really getting for being part of NASCAR's show? Or, are we making a dent in the consumers we need to reach, or are we just placating a diminishing domestic-oriented constituency?

    And nobody in the motorsports departments wants to deal with the reality of the situation either. Given the choice of racing in NASCAR or not racing at all, they will always just shrug their shoulders and go along to get along with the NASCAR juggernaut. It's as much about inertia as anything else.

    And that's just a flat-out travesty.

    Two years ago, General Motors walked away from one of the most important racing programs in its history. Their Cadillac American Le Mans Series prototype racing program had endured setbacks and fits and starts, yet they were just on the verge of becoming consistently competitive against the dominant Audi racing program. But then they walked away from it, ostensibly because "they just didn't have the money," as one of GM's top executives pointedly told me at Pebble Beach last summer. So, instead of going head-to-head against Audi for the overall win at the 24 Hours of Le Mans - the most prestigious sports car race in the world - GM folded its tent and cancelled the program.

    It was one of the most momentously wrongheaded decisions ever taken by an automobile company. And the real reason was not that GM didn't have the money, the real reason is no one had the cojones to say "no" to the NASCAR machine. So, instead of competing for the hearts and minds of imported car intenders around the world with their resurgent Cadillac brand, they shored up Monte Carlo's stature as one of America's favorite "go to" rental cars.

    The sooner Detroit collectively realizes that they're just another sideshow in the NASCAR circus, the better off they'll be.

    It's time for Detroit to finally pull the plug on their NASCAR involvement.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. UCFGavin

    UCFGavin Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    Messages:
    131,062
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Orlando
    cliffnotes? highlighted good parts?
     
  3. Jim311

    Jim311 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Messages:
    100,368
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Gainesville, FL
    What the fuck does that guy care if DC, Ford, and others are spending 75 million a year on NASCAR? It's not his fucking money.
     
  4. el_gato_negro

    el_gato_negro New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    8,390
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I don't know why they're called "stock" cars anymore. They actually were at one time... :hs:
     
  5. Ayutollah

    Ayutollah Guest

    cliff notes: nascar is shit
     
  6. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,775
    Likes Received:
    1,656
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    No cliffs - read it all, then comment.
     
  7. 94SupraTT

    94SupraTT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2001
    Messages:
    23,075
    Likes Received:
    229
    Location:
    Los Tempe
    acctually i think the nation should pull the plug on Nascar Roundy roundy racnig, fuckin stupid if you ask me
     
  8. I thought they were caled stock cars because of all the advertised companies on their cars :o

    but that was like ages ago. i just call it asscar now
     
  9. spooky

    spooky OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    41,964
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    seattle
     
  10. el_gato_negro

    el_gato_negro New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    8,390
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    NASCAR on a road course is good though. :eek3d:
     
  11. tun

    tun Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    54,960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York City
     
  12. troutie

    troutie New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Messages:
    72,642
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Haven, CT
     
  13. MumblingJoe169

    MumblingJoe169 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2002
    Messages:
    10,318
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Baltimore
    i cant wait till all fucking american racing goes under. Its just bullshit. I wish F1 had a bigger market in this country. Im thinking of going to Indy next year, and showing some love to Alonso and the Renault team
     
  14. DMClark

    DMClark Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    37,589
    Likes Received:
    0
    This guy is good.

    The big three have no reason to sponsor it anyway. If could easily go on without them.
     
  15. HisXLNC

    HisXLNC ๑۩۞۩๑ Hot ๑۩۞۩๑

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2000
    Messages:
    137,235
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Island of Electronicus
    All his points are incredibly valid.
     
  16. YAMOTA

    YAMOTA Guest

    let's face it, when it comes to road racing, America has a long way to go before we can catch up to the rest of the world
     
  17. AlkyHauler

    AlkyHauler Do you feel lucky punk? OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2002
    Messages:
    171,012
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Location:
    Dirty South
    I kinda agree. :dunno:
     
  18. Mr.Fusion

    Mr.Fusion feast upon my magnificence

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2000
    Messages:
    43,024
    Likes Received:
    82
    Location:
    Austin,Texas
    I :love: Nascar
     
  19. tun

    tun Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    54,960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York City
    it's boring. the crashes are more exciting to watch in NASCAR when the redneck drivers start beating the shit out of each other in the garage for wrecking their car :o
     
  20. Rip The Jacker

    Rip The Jacker New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    53,993
    Likes Received:
    0
    too bad it'll never happen :hs:
     
  21. DMClark

    DMClark Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2001
    Messages:
    37,589
    Likes Received:
    0
    That one was cool to watch.
     
  22. Dalai Lama

    Dalai Lama Guest

    does anyone have the link to the .wav file where that guy calls a redneck up on the phone and says they are going to get a black guy to drive a nascar?
     
  23. tun

    tun Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Messages:
    54,960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New York City
    that was so fucking funny :bowrofl:
     
  24. AlkyHauler

    AlkyHauler Do you feel lucky punk? OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2002
    Messages:
    171,012
    Likes Received:
    1,355
    Location:
    Dirty South
    thats hilarious :rofl:
     
  25. avoid

    avoid New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    5,320
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    nyc/Ft. Lauderdale

Share This Page