GUN Ct wants to ban tasers from police use

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by TL1000RSquid, Aug 17, 2006.

  1. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    Apparently they think to many people die from its use :hsugh: well #1 maybe if the suspect wasn't resisting arrest he wouldnt get tasered? :hsugh: And if LEOs dont have tasers to subdue the suspect I wonder how many more people will be shot by the police instead. stupid fucking liberals
    http://www.courant.com/news/opinion...taug17,0,2116961.story?coll=hc-headlines-oped
    Ban Stun Guns
    August 17, 2006

    Stun guns, those wonderful toys that allow police to disable suspects by piercing them with two darts that send electric current through their central nervous system, don't kill people or contribute to their deaths. The devices actually save lives and cut down on police injuries.

    So goes the hype from Taser International of Scottsdale, Ariz., the leading manufacturer of the weapons, and testimonials from more than 9,000 police and military agencies, including 131 in Connecticut, that have added Tasers to their arsenal.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    SPONSORED LINKS
    Perhaps it was just incredibly bad timing that caused about 180 suspects in the United States and Canada to drop dead shortly after police jolted them with stun guns. According to medical examiners, they really died of drug intoxication, bad health or their hearts just stopped beating through no fault of the Tasers. A very high number of post-tasing deaths were caused by "excited delirium syndrome," a recently discovered condition, not yet recognized by the American Medical Association or the American Psychiatric Association, that seems to occur only in police restraint fatalities.

    That's right, all those people would have died anyway. Stun guns aren't dangerous at all. And my name is Daffy Duck.

    Not only can stun guns cause serious injury, they've given casual torture a perversely fashionable appeal. Turning a suspect into a spastic pile of flesh by preventing his muscles from contracting for five seconds at a time has ceased to be repulsive - just another day at the office. Besides, those most likely to require zapping are street-corner drug addicts and emotionally disturbed poor people. So who cares?

    But that's precisely why the state should follow the advice of Amnesty International and ban stun guns until it formulates consistent and coherent rules that address their potential to kill. Data shows that drug addicts and mental patients are also the most vulnerable to dying after being zapped.

    Yet, the only unwavering guideline seems to be that a Taser should be fired as often as is appropriate to subdue a suspect - a standard open to very broad interpretation, depending on where you happen to be.

    The absence of uniform criteria means that what may pass as excessive or inappropriate tasing in, say, West Hartford could be perfectly acceptable in New Britain, where Jesus Negron died last month after an officer stunned him twice in front of a witness who said Negron was handcuffed to a stairway railing when the second shot was fired. New Britain at least has a general set of written guidelines on Taser use. Stamford, which equipped its police department with Tasers only a few weeks ago, has no written rules.

    Some police departments limit the number of times that a stun gun may be fired. Others don't. Some departments require a full written report whenever a stun gun is fired. Others can't be bothered with the paperwork simply because stun-gun use is already so routine that filling out reports would gridlock the agency. Some departments prohibit officers from zapping children, senior citizens and pregnant women and only seven states and the District of Columbia prohibit civilians from possessing stun guns. What's more, no one seems to know how much juice is enough. The strength of the electric current in a stun gun varies depending on the model and the manufacturer.

    Still, Taser International has succeeded in building a perception that the gadgets are effective, safe and above reproach, an opinion aided by the firm's employment of off-duty police officers as Taser trainers. Taser International spokesman Steve Tuttle said that the company has compensated many trainers with stock options, an additional incentive for them to promote the product among colleagues as the greatest thing that ever happened to law enforcement.

    Not that stun guns are a hard sell. Studies confirm that they do help to dramatically reduce police injuries and cops will embrace anything that improves their odds of making it to those fat retirement pensions without a scratch.

    Unfortunately, the lack of regulation and the generally accepted principle that stun guns are harmless leave way too much room for the proverbial loose cannon with a badge to take a life needlessly and escape close scrutiny.

    That's unconscionable. And until Connecticut closes that loophole, there should be a moratorium on stun gun use.

    David Medina is an editorial writer at The Courant.
     
  2. Gimik

    Gimik New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    36,559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Feenicks, Az
    Jesus. Biased reporting much?

    So they'd rather people get shot with guns over these?
     
  3. Aequitas

    Aequitas If it keeps on raining, levee's going to break.

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,406
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    I think they need to focus more on the loose cannon police officer than the taser. I wonder why all these people focus on the tools and not the people. Seems like the writer has a certain dislike for LEOs.

    I've gotten into arguments about this before. I usually say, would you rather get pepper sprayed (15mins), hit with a baton (who knows how long the bruise will be there), shot (dead), and tased (5 seconds).
     
  4. Gimik

    Gimik New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    36,559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Feenicks, Az
    I'd say that's a HUGE understatement.
    resenting LEOs for WANTING TO LIVE?!
     
  5. Ford4Life

    Ford4Life Guest

    If the writer had a bad time with cops before, wait until a few of the local boys read his article.

    What a dickhead.
     
  6. Iceburn

    Iceburn Made in the USA

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,043
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Fucking stupid. 180 deaths is worth the thousands of lives saved. On a lighter side I saw a drunk guy get tasered at a Cardinals game because he was pissed they wouldn't sell him another beer. :mamoru:
     
  7. Gundam

    Gundam Tell Drama he's on my to do list, right after inse

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2000
    Messages:
    32,299
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Sacramento, CA
    Seriously. Fucken disgusting.
     
  8. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    Pics?
     
  9. Original Username

    Original Username New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    5,175
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    716/617
    Soon cops will have to give cake and soda to the alleged criminals in hope that they'll put on the handcuffs. We wouldn't want to hurt the scum.
     
  10. daviid

    daviid cell tower tech

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    i love this dumbass state
     
  11. kellyclan

    kellyclan She only loves you when she's drunk.

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    18,944
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's the Courant, what do you want?

    On the flipside, some medics upstate recently had a combative patient die on them after they chemically restrained him. But it didn't have anything to do with all the speed the guy had already taken. :rolleyes:

    And now, our system is finally going to permit chemical restraint. :bigthumb:
     
  12. Artyboy

    Artyboy Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere in CO
    I'd rather people get shot with real guns over tasers in some cases :mamoru:
     
  13. Big Daddy

    Big Daddy New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    3,451
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Yeah, I'd rather take one in the chest then to get stunned.. :jerkit:
     

Share This Page