Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by no-pistons, Feb 21, 2005.
Yeah, looks real cool with the simulated beadlocks parked on a some concrete near a warehouse.
Its 2wd, what do you want it to do, climb up a muddy mountain?
I think the Colorado SS(?) concept is much cooler than that. That just looks, well...
It LOOKS good, but it's not good if you know what i mean.
wow, it was an underpowered truck that can't tow jack shit... now it's a street-queen underpowered truck that can't tow jack shit.
Sorry... Colorado == teh lose.
i realy love the front of those trucks
I guess it's just a California thing, you hardcore mud-bogging rednecks wouldn't understand.
waste of money to make a mall cruiser. Really have to be careful about poping the beads when you air down to climb curbs and drive through the grass
It's not my truck, but I don't really see it as a waste of money if your getting your truck to look good. The only off-roading most Southern Californians do is taking our dirt bikes and quads out to the desert.
Its not supposed to be a truck that can tow a lot of weight, thats like saying that the S10 or the ford ranger is underpowered and cant tow.
2005 Tacoma : 6500 lbs towing
2005 Frontier : 6500 lbs towing
All Im saying is that if your going to get a truck to tow you wouldnt get a Colorado, because that is not what it is made for.
bring back the s-10!
That thing is sexy
IMO, colorado > s10
im torn i love the front of the colorado but the motor is a pile of shit
agreed. They *LOOK* good from the cab forward (needs a bigger bed, still) but chevy needs to throw the 262 back in the mix.
and fix the ugly rear wheel well
no way in hell colorado > s-10
unless you actually want to pass someone on the highway...
or unless you want to mod anything.
THIS is the coolest colorade ever.