GUN Chicago Tribune publishes pro-gun piece on park carry

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by Soybomb, Nov 29, 2006.

  1. Soybomb

    Soybomb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...n?coll=chi-navrailnews-nav&ctrack=1&cset=true

    Concealed weapons in the wilderness
    by Steve Chapman

    Published November 26, 2006

    Lots of kids, when very young, worry about monsters under the bed. Even when Mom or Dad comes in to reassure them, the kids may still worry. But as they get older, they begin to check under the bed themselves. And eventually, after many monster-free nights, they figure out that the danger is purely imaginary, and they stop worrying.

    You would think by now gun-control supporters would have made the same progress on one of their most fearsome demons: the licensing of citizens to carry concealed firearms. But they seem to be trapped in a recurring nightmare that exists only in their minds.

    So imagine their alarm at a bill recently introduced in Congress that would allow people with concealed-carry permits to take weapons into their home state's national parks. The indefatigably anti-gun New York Times warned that the measure is a step toward "nationalizing the armed paranoia that the National Rifle Association and its cohorts stand for" and "can only endanger the public."

    Such fears may have been plausible once upon a time--when Americans were generally not allowed to carry firearms. But since 1987, when Florida decided to let law-abiding citizens get concealed-carry permits, that has changed. Today, some 40 states have such "shall-issue" laws. They've become the norm, and the fears they inspired have proved unfounded.

    As it happens, serious crime has waned in the intervening years. Murders are now at their lowest level since the 1960s. Violent crime has been cut by nearly 60 percent since the peak year of 1994. Gun crimes have plunged as well.

    It may not be true, as some experts believe, that America has gotten safer because more people are legally packing heat. But it's impossible to claim that the change has made us less safe.

    At the outset of this experiment, gun opponents forecast that hot-tempered pistoleros would spray bullets at the slightest provocation, requiring the rest of us to wade through rivers of blood just to cross the street. In fact, one of the most conspicuous facts about handgun licensees is their mild temper. It's rare for them to commit crimes, and even rarer for them to use their firearms to commit crimes.

    A report by the Texas Department of Public Safety found that in a state with more than 200,000 people licensed to carry guns, only 180 were convicted of crimes in 2001, and most of those crimes didn't involve firearms. Only one licensee was convicted of murder. Florida, which has nearly 400,000 permit holders, revoked only 330 licenses last year--about one out of every 1,200.

    This record should not be surprising. As a rule, concealed-carry licenses are off-limits to anyone with a history of crime, substance abuse, drunken driving or serious mental illness, and most states require safety training. In any case, people who are inclined to commit mayhem generally don't seek state licenses to carry guns, any more than they ask permission to break into houses or beat up girlfriends. It's the law-abiding folks who apply for licenses.

    Why would these peaceable souls want to take their guns when hiking or camping in a national park? Same reason they might take them other places: a desire to protect themselves. Though federal lands are mostly safe, they sometimes play host to crime. In fact, park rangers are far more likely to be assaulted or killed than FBI agents.

    The Times says, "If Americans want to feel safer in their national parks, the proper solution is to increase park funding, which has decayed steadily since the Bush administration took office." Maybe that would help, but we can't put a park ranger at every bend in the trail. And if you run into a thug in the backcountry, you can't expect the police or anyone else to come to the rescue.

    For some people--solitary women in particular--having the means of self-defense in the woods can be not only a comfort but a lifesaver. It's fine to trust in one's fellow man. That doesn't mean it's paranoid to have a Plan B.

    Judging from a wealth of experience, adopting this new policy would be a non-event, with no unwanted repercussions. The only danger it poses is to criminals, who would lose some easy prey, and anti-gun zealots, who would once again be proven wrong.

    ----------

    E-mail: [email protected]
     
  2. Slick26

    Slick26 Gun|Bike|Cigar|PS3|Beer |Whisky|Night Crew

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2006
    Messages:
    47,998
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mini Soda
    Great read! Very true. :bigthumb:
    And coming from Chicago, of all places.
     
  3. Thunderbear

    Thunderbear Yggdrasil's Forester.

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2001
    Messages:
    17,946
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    -Tick tock, tick tock til Ragnarök-
    Damn, hell must be cold as shit right now.
     
  4. Aequitas

    Aequitas If it keeps on raining, levee's going to break.

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,406
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Florida
    So, was that guy just passing through?
     
  5. rat

    rat New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2003
    Messages:
    1,890
    Likes Received:
    0
    I live in Illinois, about 70 miles from chicago. I had to do a double take when i saw it said from the chicago tribun. . . can't believe they would write a pro-gun article.
     
  6. daviid

    daviid cell tower tech

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    1,628
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    why what a novel idea!:noes: at least not everyone in chicago is a doosh
     
  7. [DWI]

    [DWI] Master of Nothing

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2000
    Messages:
    21,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    Even though I am a Floridian I feel compelled to write a thank you letter to the email address he gives at the end of the article. Being the Chicago Tribune it might not be a bad idea to let this guy (and the rest of the decision making staff) know that his article was read and aprricated by a large group of people. I bet most of the letters and emails they get are always bitching about things, especially a pro-gun article. Might not be a bad idea for the more articluate members of WMD to write a supportive email.
     
  8. [DWI]

    [DWI] Master of Nothing

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2000
    Messages:
    21,936
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maine
    I'm glad some place is cold, I'm getting sick of 80+ degree days
     
  9. Gimik

    Gimik New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Messages:
    36,559
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Feenicks, Az
    great read and so true.
     
  10. DaJMan

    DaJMan When i was young, i dreamed of being a baseball

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
    Messages:
    8,004
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Qld Aus
    i find it interesting that *usually* the pro-gun message is written eloquently, calmly and without outragous claims, whereas more often than not the anti gun message is written to instill fear in those who have yet to make a decision about whether guns are baby killing monsters...

    just an observation
     
  11. Phantomlord

    Phantomlord New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Near Dallas, Texas
    That was a very refreshing read.
     
  12. Keesh

    Keesh New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    15,333
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice to see somthing like that gets published every once and a while.
     

Share This Page