GUN CA legal lower reciever, round 3

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by PanzerAce, Mar 2, 2006.

  1. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    Ok, this is on several other firearms related forums, so I decided to share it with the rest of you. Looks like, as was said on CGN, that Bill decided to push the big red button:


    Cliffs: the DOJ and AG are about to get their asses dragged over the coals by the media.
     
  2. islanderman7

    islanderman7 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Santa Barbara, CA
  3. Artyboy

    Artyboy Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    12,692
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Somewhere in CO
    Too bad that'll just result in tougher restrictions so they don't have to go through the pain in the ass of updating again in the future.
     
  4. twofourtysx

    twofourtysx New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2002
    Messages:
    13,091
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CA
    the letter wont, their fuck up will
     
  5. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    wow, as if tougher restrictions were not going to happen any way *rolls eyes*, maybe you want to pull your head out and realize that some of us live in a very liberal state, and anything that throws a wrench in the gears of the DOJ and the legislature's machinations is a good thing for gun owners. And what do you mean 'updating again'? They have NEVER updated the list. The only list that has ever existed for these was the original.
     
  6. Alphaeus

    Alphaeus New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    12,101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    99 cent pistol grip? wtf is that
     
  7. Dsking85

    Dsking85 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    13,443
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    ECU
    [​IMG]
     
  8. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    :ugh: :greddy: :mamoru:
     
  9. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    actually, he means the regular pistol grip on a AR. Remember, this was written to get public pressure to move the DOJ, so he wrote it for the media, not for us.

    Oh, and that grip is not a pistol grip. infact, is was DEFINED as not a pistol grip by the ATF.
     
  10. Furner

    Furner New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    7,584
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI
    I dont think CA DOJ cares what the ATF says......
     
  11. mrbill

    mrbill New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,726
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cibolo,Tx
    :werd:
     
  12. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    Thats what I was trying to get acorss, guess it didnt work very well. And actually, there is currently a sample of that grip at the DOJ to determin its legality.
     

Share This Page