Bros of the VAG: Quality or Quantity? Thats the question I ask...

Discussion in 'Vaginarium' started by just_another_on, Dec 21, 2009.

?

Which is better/more imperative to you?

  1. Quality

    38 vote(s)
    71.7%
  2. Quantity

    4 vote(s)
    7.5%
  3. Im just a women and im here for the manwhores

    11 vote(s)
    20.8%
  1. just_another_on

    just_another_on New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    30,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    What matters more, quantity or quality?

    Simple Poll


    ----

    Bros, when talking to your bros/buddies, what have you noticed tends to 'matter' more? Me and my roommate got into a debate over the weekend (non heated, more of a discussion) about this situation.


    As a single male, no attachments or relationships in ANY sort of the matter, would you prefer to slam a 9 or 10/10 or would you prefer to have, say, 3-4 5-6's? Or maybe even lower :mamoru:



    My roommate puts down numbers, :o, Ill give him that. First week in the apartment he had 6 different girls in the first 5 days. What ever. Dont really care. He sometimes will bust my chops cause im not bringing home a different chick every night. But then I said to him... "Dude, home girl was a 10, the 5 girls you brought home in the past two weeks dont even add up to 10" and that ended the debate, :rofl:



    I know there are some guys here whove only slept with 1-2 people in there life time, and I know there are some guys who have tipped well over the double digits mark.
     
  2. PcH

    PcH Guest

    Quality, no questions about it. I've had some slampigs and there's no replacing a quality woman.
     
  3. just_another_on

    just_another_on New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    30,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    You've been with 3 women bro :o :rofl:


    No offense :love:
     
  4. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    quantity in the 6-8 range
     
  5. JohnJohnJohnson

    JohnJohnJohnson Effetely Sipping My Latte OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    23,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manhattan
    basically. quantity in the 7-10 range
     
  6. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    most of the guys that I know that pull lots of women also get hotter women.

    even if you subtract out the beasts, overall their numbers are high.

    if I'm going out with a dude, I want him to be good with girls but I don't want him to outshine me :o
     
  7. JohnJohnJohnson

    JohnJohnJohnson Effetely Sipping My Latte OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    23,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manhattan
    .

    and it's not just a law of probability thing, the women they get on average are hotter.

    edit: what you said in your edit.
     
  8. just_another_on

    just_another_on New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    30,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    See thats the thing with me and my roommate. Neither of us are 'hot' or super amazingly attractive IMO (no homo), but we are both extremely confident.

    Id say our 'looks' are at about average now that I've lost some weight and am not looked at as the 'fat kid' of the group :hs:. But him 'outshining' me is kinda what makes me try harder to pull the wimmenz :o
     
  9. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    agreed. guys that are good with women, in my experience, don't really associate with ugly girls.
     
  10. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    I don't mean outshine in a physical sense. just a personality/outgoingness way. I don't want to compete for the attention if I don't have to :o I'm lazy

    I guess it could apply to physical attractiveness as well, but to a lesser degree. I have friend that do male modeling that I'll take out because women are attracted to them, but then I do all the talking
     
  11. just_another_on

    just_another_on New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    30,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    And this is why in retrospect I say quantity > quality.


    Why? Cause when pulling in quantity you have options and opportunity to turn someone down. My roommate brings home more girls than I do, with out a doubt. But the girls I DO bring home, I feel almost like they HAVE to be good looking. :hs:


    Man, im starting to sound shallow :o
     
  12. ForgottenSpiral

    ForgottenSpiral Hope and Irony OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    23,699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NoVA
    All about the quality. I don't know anyone who cares more about the quantity. Unless we're talking guys who would rather date a crazy chick than be single. That's a whole different subject though. :mamoru:
     
  13. PcH

    PcH Guest

    I'm clean son :fawk:
     
  14. just_another_on

    just_another_on New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    30,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    :hsugh:
     
  15. ForgottenSpiral

    ForgottenSpiral Hope and Irony OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    23,699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NoVA
    Well 1 > 0. :mamoru: So how does 0 factor into quality over quantity?
     
  16. THoC

    THoC New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Messages:
    7,341
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TRampa, FL
    i would much rather fuck a 9 or 10 once then fuck six 5s.

    i dont have interest in sex if im not attracted to a girl.

    probably why ive never fucked a girl that was lower then a 6.

    also, probably why my #s are lower then they could be.
     
  17. Bob Brown

    Bob Brown bewshit, bewshit, bewshit

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    3,909
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm always for quality.
     
  18. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    well I think it's fairly obvious we aren't talking about dating.
     
  19. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    I agree, I'm probably not going to sleep with somebody I'm not attracted to. but at the same time, my window of attraction is probably wider than most.
     
  20. ForgottenSpiral

    ForgottenSpiral Hope and Irony OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    23,699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NoVA
    Well you're missing my point. Lets say someone only has the option of one 'low quality' person or no one at all. Where does that fall in the question of quality versus quantity?
     
  21. just_another_on

    just_another_on New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    30,849
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    That doesnt.

    And thats not what this poll is.

    You, falconer and JJJ almost always make these polls stray off from what they're about.

    GTFO with that ethical/thinking shit. Were talking about fucking bitches and getting money.
     
  22. JohnJohnJohnson

    JohnJohnJohnson Effetely Sipping My Latte OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    23,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manhattan
    Let's say a person creates more options with 9's and 10's by pursuing lots of women in the 6-10 range than by pursuing only 9's and 10's. Where does that fit into this question? Problem that giz and I are running into.
     
  23. ForgottenSpiral

    ForgottenSpiral Hope and Irony OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2004
    Messages:
    23,699
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NoVA
    Nothing ethical about it. And I already said it was a separate issue. giz quoted what I said and I replied.

    And for the record, I fail to see how my point really is off-topic. I mean we're talking about which is more important, quantity or quality. So I merely took it a step further and asked if low quality is better than no quantity.

    I'll think where ever I want, bitch. If you can't keep up, that's your dilemma. :fawk:
     
  24. giz

    giz Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2004
    Messages:
    15,634
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    salt lake
    that guy doesn't even qualify for the debate :rofl:
     
  25. JohnJohnJohnson

    JohnJohnJohnson Effetely Sipping My Latte OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    23,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manhattan
    Hey, you're the one creating a false dichotomy here.

    This is another of those polarizing vag issues, "Are women funny or hot?" "Are men happy or amoral?" There's a fake either-or wrapped up in your question when in reality the two things can be compatible and may even be intertwined.
     

Share This Page