Autoweek - The Next LXs - Chrysler Imperial and Dodge Challenger

Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by TriShield, Jan 3, 2006.

  1. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,776
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    With Challenger and Imperial concepts, Chrysler shows versatility of rear-drive 300C chassis

    [​IMG]

    By BOB GRITZINGER
    AutoWeek | Published 01/02/06, 7:21 am et

    Get out your ruler and mark off seven inches.

    Technically, that’s the total distance, measured in wheelbase, separating the beefy muscle car image of the Dodge Challenger concept from the highbrow extravagance of the Chrysler Imperial concept. In reality the two Chrysler 300-based concepts on the company’s stand at the North American International Auto Show couldn’t be farther apart if one was the moon and the other the stars.

    The lead pony is the Challenger, the Hemi-powered beast of a four-seat coupe for which we’ve all been screaming since the awkward silence that greeted the debut of the highly anticipated Charger as a four-door sedan. With a nod to Paul Harvey, with Challenger, now we know the rest of the story.

    In concept guise Challenger’s wheelbase is chopped by four inches (to 116 inches) compared to a Charger or 300C. But with an eye trained closely on proper proportion, exterior designer Micheal Castiglione of Chrysler’s Pacifica studio in California kept the length in check. Compared to the original 1970 Challenger—the styling inspiration for the new car—the concept is six inches shorter and two inches wider. The result is squat and tough, the kind of styling for which Challenger is remembered.

    “Instead of merely re-creating that [1970] car, the designers endeavored to build a Challenger most people see in their mind’s eye—a vehicle without the imperfections like the old car’s tucked-under wheels, long front overhang and imperfect fits,” says Tom Tremont, vice president of advanced vehicle design for Chrysler.

    [​IMG]

    Says Castiglione of the 1970 model, “For me that car symbolizes the most passionate era of automotive design. We wanted the concept car to evoke all those sweet memories... everything you thought the Challenger was, and more.”

    Challenger keeps a lot of the good: the signature horizontal “thrust” line that creases the fender and door and kicks up just ahead of the rear wheel; the wide look at front and rear; and the long, low hood accented by twin diagonal scoops fitted with functional butterfly valve intakes. Inside, deep gauge holes, a leather-wrapped steering wheel (with ribbed steering column, of course) and a pistol-grip shift handle evoke Challengers of old.

    Like Challengers past, this concept packs more than its share of muscle under the hood in the form of an SRT-tuned 6.1-liter, 425-hp, 420-lb-ft Hemi V8, linked to a six-speed manual transmission. Chrysler estimates the fully functional concept should rocket 0 to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds, clip the quarter-mile in 13 seconds and attain a top speed of 174 mph.

    [​IMG]

    At the opposite extreme lies the luxurious Imperial riding on a 123-inch wheelbase, a three-inch stretch over the 300C. To achieve the proper proportions for the concept, the overall length grows 17 inches to 214 inches, and the overall height is six inches taller than a 300C. The car rides on massive 22-inch turbine-finned wheels and tires, with passengers sitting nearly seven inches higher than in the 300C.

    Envisioned as a “noble” yet attainable flagship positioned a cut above the 300C (“It’s a six-figure image but at a much lower price,” says Tremont), the concept designed in Chrysler’s Auburn Hills studio doesn’t mimic Imperials of the past, but it does draw on some of the styling cues from those older cars. It also carries expressive attributes from Chrysler’s long line of concept cars, from the 1953 d’Elegance to the Fire-power that premiered at last year’s Detroit show.

    [​IMG]

    Among the design details incorporated into the concept: the long flowing hood and front end dominated by an upright radiator and strong horizontal grille; brushed and polished aluminum pods that evoke free-standing headlamps of Imperials from the 1930s and 1960s; circular LED taillights with floating outer rings that bring back the “gun sight” taillight look of early 1960s Imperials; and a roofline pulled rearward to enlarge the cabin and create a strong profile.

    The wide-open, B-pillar-less doors allow a panoramic view of the show car’s opulent four-seat, two-tone interior, where no expense is spared when it comes to use of leather, suede, California burl wood accents and satin-finished aluminum. Designers also paid considerable attention to handcrafted components like the sculptured instrument panel with large dual gauges, coved ceiling, and the floating oval armrests in the doors, all bathed in warm light.

    [​IMG]

    Dynamically, Imperial also is diametrically opposed to Challenger, with the latter adopting a full-throated roar while the former is loaded with sound-deadening insulation and is tuned for smooth and silent running. But even in its subtlety, the stately Imperial is more driver’s car than chauffeur-driven limousine, says Chrysler design chief Trevor Creed. Power for the concept comes from the standard 5.7-liter, 340-hp, 390-lb-ft Hemi V8, linked to a five-speed transmission lifted from the Mercedes E-Class.

    “This is the car for somebody who has made it, who takes great pleasure in driving from place to place,” says Creed.

    [​IMG]

    Though Chrysler execs won’t commit to production plans for either car, there are obvious advantages to building the concepts on the so-called LX platform that underpins the wildly successful 300C, Dodge Magnum and Charger production cars. Not only does using existing hardware help contain the astronomical cost of building show cars, but in the event one or both concepts gets the green light, Chrysler has a much easier path to building production versions, and gets even more return on its engineering and tooling investment in the rear-drive LX platform.

    “These are strictly concepts, but we like to see people get excited because it might help make the case to take one or the other to production,” says Tremont. “There will be a completely different draw to these cars—the Mopar followers will have their Challenger, and the Imperial will appeal to a completely different audience. But they will both stimulate people’s thought processes about what could be a Chrysler.”

    We can only hope that, given a few inches, Chrysler designers and product planners will take the whole foot—and mash it on the accelerator all the way to the showroom.
     
    Last edited: Jan 3, 2006
  2. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,776
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    AW has redesigned their site and linking the pictures is a bit more difficult.
     
  3. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,776
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    [​IMG]

    The original Imperial.
     
  4. B_O_T

    B_O_T Calcio Italiano ftw

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    74,780
    Likes Received:
    0
    uploaded just cuz we all :love: TriShield

    [mg]http://uploader.ws/upload/200601/CDocuments_and_SettingsRobertDesktopbilde.jpg[/img]
    [im]http://uploader.ws/upload/200601/CDocuments_and_SettingsRobertDesktopbilde0.jpg[/img]
    [ig]http://uploader.ws/upload/200601/CDocuments_and_SettingsRobertDesktopbilde2.jpg[/img]
    [im]http://uploader.ws/upload/200601/CDocuments_and_SettingsRobertDesktopbilde4.jpg[/img]
    [ig]http://uploader.ws/upload/200601/CDocuments_and_SettingsRobertDesktopbilde5.jpg[/img]
    [mg]http://uploader.ws/upload/200601/CDocuments_and_SettingsRobertDesktopbilde6.jpg[/img]

    edit - made links nonfunctional to save scrolling
     
  5. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,776
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    [​IMG]

    60s Imperial
     
  6. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,776
    Likes Received:
    1,660
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    :bigok:
     
  7. dwarfcat

    dwarfcat COLTS FTMFW

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    36,002
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    teh dirtay filthay southern Indiana
    That challenger is seriously the hottest thing I have ever seen. I will sell myself into sex to own one someday.
     
  8. toconnx

    toconnx New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2003
    Messages:
    10,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Connecticut
    is the *edit* challenger (sorry) indy rear or live axle?
     
  9. tefnut

    tefnut build

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    5,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CAD -> TX -> NZ
    :rofl: the Imperial looks like a kit car, designed in some bum's garage, to be sold on eBay
     
  10. Urinal Mint

    Urinal Mint bourbon afficionado

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2001
    Messages:
    113,373
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Houston
    The Imperial concept looks like a wannabe Silver Seraph.
     
  11. NIGHTMARE

    NIGHTMARE Ravens >*

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2001
    Messages:
    32,197
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Home of the Ravens.
    Challenger looks hawt.
     
  12. Emfuser

    Emfuser Nuclear Moderator Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2002
    Messages:
    83,911
    Likes Received:
    466
    Location:
    Irmo, SC
    Challenger :bowdown:
    New Camaro coming in some years too... :bowdown: :hs:

    Fuck that 4-door, performance sedan bullshit. :greddy:
     
  13. tefnut

    tefnut build

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    5,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CAD -> TX -> NZ
  14. tefnut

    tefnut build

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    5,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CAD -> TX -> NZ
  15. tefnut

    tefnut build

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Messages:
    5,263
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    CAD -> TX -> NZ
  16. tzedek

    tzedek OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2004
    Messages:
    40,693
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Western MA
  17. zatar

    zatar New Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2002
    Messages:
    17,129
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    South of Graceland
    Hot Damn. The more I see that Challenger, the more I Like it. :wackit:
     
  18. mucky

    mucky .

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2001
    Messages:
    44,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    Holy fucking Chrysler Rolls Royce, Batman! :eek4:
     
  19. BlindSyde

    BlindSyde New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    God that challanger is hot.
     
  20. CornUponCob

    CornUponCob New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2001
    Messages:
    15,319
    Likes Received:
    0
    .
     
  21. mucky

    mucky .

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2001
    Messages:
    44,972
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know the 300C was coincidentally resembled a Bentley, even though it did have some styling cues from the original 300C. But this is ridiculous. :run:

    [​IMG]
     
  22. d33znuts

    d33znuts Owned by Websense

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Anaheim, CA
    :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
    Now thats how the challenger should have been in the first place!!! I don't like that @ss tho...
     
  23. whatever

    whatever OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    110,362
    Likes Received:
    292
    :wackit: sooooo fucking hot
     
  24. Drewski

    Drewski New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2002
    Messages:
    11,340
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scarberia aka Scarlem, ON
    The Challenger is TOO retro for my tastes. From a quick glance, I’d swear it’s an old car from the 70’s. At least the new Camaro and Mustang have some more obvious modern cue’s that differentiate them from their older brothers.

    The Imperial is a nice upper class sedan. Kinda reminds me of the Maybach which is great.

    Any word on where they would be made? Brampton can’t take on much (if any) more production.
     
  25. BlindSyde

    BlindSyde New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    What's the retail on one of those?




    IBmorethanyoucanaffordpalDODGE
     

Share This Page