GUN AR15 vs. Ak47

Discussion in 'On Topic' started by Resin, Nov 23, 2007.

  1. Resin

    Resin OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 21, 2003
    Messages:
    25,580
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wa
    Which gun gives you most bang for your buck? Could you take one of those to go hunting?
     
  2. VladTemplar

    VladTemplar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,489
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd argue the AR-15 due to the virtually limitless abilities to change it around.

    An AR-15 chambered for .308 with a decent scope is absolutely deadly for anything you could want to reasonably want to take down.
     
  3. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    AK, depending what your hunting and your state laws 5.56 maybe illegal for some game.
     
  4. VladTemplar

    VladTemplar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,489
    Likes Received:
    0
    Fine just disagree with me and make me look bad. :wtc:

    You probably know better than me anyways. I'm better with the law involving firearms than I am with actual firearms.
     
  5. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    You could take down a deer with either really, but some places consider .223 what it really is a varmint round :mamoru:
    AR does have more modularity but they have plenty of accessories out there for AK's too.
    For the same price as a top name AR you can pick up an AK and a case of ammo so I'd consider that the better value.
     
  6. Resin

    Resin OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 21, 2003
    Messages:
    25,580
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Wa
    which one has better aftermarket parts available
     
  7. TL1000RSquid

    TL1000RSquid ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NY
    AR has more variety of stuff available. You can usually get stuff that'll do the same thing for the AK though.
     
  8. Lightsped

    Lightsped Glockaholic

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kennesaw/Acworth Georgia
    IMHO, the AK is the better value/bang for your buck. The AK may not be as "pretty" as an AR, but the AK will work just as well for half of the money (comparing a base AR price to a base AK price).
     
  9. david_4x4

    david_4x4 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Texas
    I'd buy an AR, just because there's so much shit for aftermarket and change arounds availible it's laughable.
     
  10. kellyclan

    kellyclan She only loves you when she's drunk.

    Joined:
    May 16, 2001
    Messages:
    18,944
    Likes Received:
    0
  11. twistid

    twistid Banged By Super Models Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    40,849
    Likes Received:
    112
    Location:
    The Kansass/Oklahomo Border
    i'd go with an ak, long before an ar15.
     
  12. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    the ak is cheaper.

    but I hate em

    get an ar.
     
  13. SnakeEater

    SnakeEater OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 23, 2006
    Messages:
    8,373
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Burma
    yep.
    specialy when swapping different caliber uppers.2 pins and your set.minus the mags.
    but,take the beowulf.you can take a 5.56/.223 mag and use it for .50b.
    10 rounds will fit into a 30 rd mag.
     
  14. Ebtromba

    Ebtromba Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    6,050
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    alexandria, VA
    I assume most folks who hunt with an AR do not do so with one chambered for .223/5.56
     
  15. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
  16. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    bang for the buck, go with the AK. If you want anything other than the base rifle though, go with the AR.

    Personally, my next AR is going to be in 6.5G :noes:
     
  17. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    i would love an ar10. Personally, I love my 5.56 ar. But that's a 16" barrel, and it's getting the tacticool treatment.

    I'd love to build my own .308 sniper-style ar... But I hear that building a .308 costs more than buying a pre-built. Anyone have links to reasonable stripped lowers and uppers?
     
  18. krott5333

    krott5333 Guest

    how many times has this been discussed, honestly?

    AK
    more reliable
    cheaper
    less accurate


    AR
    plenty reliable if you're not going to the deserts of Iraq
    more accurate
    more expensive
     
  19. KIDRR

    KIDRR Duck dog>* OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Messages:
    49,752
    Likes Received:
    1,129
    Location:
    North Mexico
    I wouldn't want to hunt anything other than squirrels with either. There are much better/cheaper surplus rifles to hunt with but just get a Rem 700+scope and call it a day.
     
  20. Soybomb

    Soybomb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    fixt for betterness
     
  21. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    i'm shopping around for a nice bolt-action, and the savage fl10p seems to be a better buy... discuss.
     
  22. PanzerAce

    PanzerAce Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    14,502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    N37°18'37" W120°29'50"
    :ugh:

    negative ghostrider. 6.5G > 6.8SPC

    Wider range of weights available, WAY better long range, better short range as well. After seeing gel-tests of both, I honestly don't know why anybody wants 6.8
     
  23. Ebtromba

    Ebtromba Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    6,050
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    alexandria, VA
    <<< never been deer huntin

    legality aside, i did not realize it was commonplace for folks to hunt deer with .223/5.56

    i thought .270 or so was about the smallest it got, generally I mean.
     
  24. P07r0457

    P07r0457 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2004
    Messages:
    28,491
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    .223 is pretty common from what I've seen on the smaller stuff. You can use it on deer, and a well-placed shot is gonna do just fine to take a small one down. -- granted they're not using mil surplus to hunt.

    But .308 and .30-06 seem to be the most common from the locals I've spoken with. with some people using .300 win mag for the big-stuff.
     
  25. Soybomb

    Soybomb New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,041
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Illinois
    Link to gel tests and load data for tests? The tests I've seen that seem to make the 6.5 look worlds superior to 6.8 have been using rounds loaded super hot in bolt guns with quite long barrels. The other tests I've seen are like this and don't seem to show 6.5 pulling away with anything http://www.tacticalforums.com/cgi-bin/tacticalubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=78;t=001185#000000

    In all fairness too my interest isn't long range target shooting, but defensive use out to 300 yards. Thats much further than I think I'd ever possibly need one and past that I'd rather go up to .308 For the 300 yards and less thing I think 6.8 is it.

     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2007

Share This Page