Discussion in 'Lifestyle' started by adamlewis88, Feb 5, 2008.
And want to work something out for a 70-200 2.8 with IS?
70-200 2.8L IS crew signing in
i was thinking of the 70-200 f4 L but that would be in maybe 2+ months. Maybe I can afford the 2.8, just dont know how necessary it is.
It's worth every penny, especially for indoor use in handholding at speeds below ~ 1/50, which is difficult at 200mm without IS.
sell/trade for 135 f/2 + 200 f/2.8? or 135 + 1.4x?
IS version is by FAR my most used lens
wanna sell that 1.4x?
oh, I don't have one anymore, I was just throwing out suggestions
135 and 70-200 IS are my babies
trust me, your liberal use of NN will defeat any of the perceived "sharpness" the non IS will get you.
Just pick up the 200mm f/2.8L instead. Or if I have to be nice.
Thats funny since I dont use it anymore...
I dont want the prime though. the 70-200 range is invaluable for me.
And is anyone reading the title?
I have the IS version. I want the NON-IS version
Completely different styles of photography...
I have the 135 f/2 and dont want to use a TC if I dont have to.
I've got a Tamron 1.4x PRO if you're interested
whatchu want for it?
I want a 70-200 2.8 IS - I have an f/4 non-is. Trade and cash? If not, how much would you sell outright for?
I posted the IS version on purpose
Here are two non
I did the same thing you are doing. I just didnt use the IS as much as I thought I would and wanted a wide angle lens. I put mine on fred miranda and had a guy trade me $550 plus his 10/10 non-IS for my IS, then I bought a 10-22 with the $550.
no crap, but are you doing it to free up some $$$ or to try and gai something you feel yours is lacking?
not many here have the non IS if any
FM or POTN would be a better place
The IS would be nice for Motorsports panning that I do.