1977 Chevrolet Monte Carlo For Sale - 115 original miles

Discussion in 'OT Driven' started by TriShield, Sep 20, 2009.

  1. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,798
    Likes Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
  2. BlazinBlazer Guy

    BlazinBlazer Guy Witness to The De-Evolution of Mankind.

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,783
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lansing, MI USA
    Just goes to show how far GM has come since the 70s.... well, all of the industry really.

    I wonder what other cars were in that collection though?
     
  3. Mitchj

    Mitchj OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    112,084
    Likes Received:
    81
    i wouldnt want to drive it either
     
  4. CJPA

    CJPA New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    114,304
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    AZ, USA
    Some idiot will buy it. God damn that is ugly. And BROWN ON BROWN, of all colors. :barf:
     
  5. Mr3GTP

    Mr3GTP OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    O motherfucking HI-O
    Late '70s/early '80s American cars; the best sales tool Japanese carmakers could ever dream of...
     
  6. Mitchj

    Mitchj OT Supporter

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    112,084
    Likes Received:
    81
    it has a massive v8 im sure

    and probably runs 16's
     
  7. twistid

    twistid Banged By Super Models Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    40,834
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    The Kansass/Oklahomo Border
    i almost bought a 75 when i was 17
     
  8. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,798
    Likes Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    This was a popular car in it's time. People loved the style of this model, so much so that GM tried to invoke it in the last Monte Carlo made (with a poor result).

    I was in high school in the mid 90s. A friend of mine bought a cherry one of these. It was slow, the doors sagged, but it ran really good and held a lot of people.

    The Japanese cars of the time were ugly and shitty. Japanese cars wouldn't catch on in the US until a few years later.
     
  9. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
  10. twistid

    twistid Banged By Super Models Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    40,834
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    The Kansass/Oklahomo Border
    :bsflag: and i'm a mopar fan.
     
  11. Mr3GTP

    Mr3GTP OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    O motherfucking HI-O
    Try 17s or 18s. Seriously. With it's low-compression, smog-equipment-choked, carbureted V8, I doubt that tank, which weighs nearly 2 tons, was putting 150 horsepower to the ground.

    A Ford Tempo would dust that stock-for-stock.
     
  12. twistid

    twistid Banged By Super Models Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    40,834
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    The Kansass/Oklahomo Border
    probably closer to 130hp on the ground. :o
     
  13. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,798
    Likes Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    The base engine was a 305-ci V8 rated at 140 horsepower, and an optional 2-barrel 350-ci V8 rated at 150 horsepower was also available (a 4-barrel 350-ci V8 rated at 160 hp was standard for California cars). Those thirsting for more power could upgrade to a 4-barrel 400-ci V8 rated at 180 horsepower. These powerplants were anemic compared to former years, but still a lot of power for 1977.

    So probably not even 150hp to the ground. My 1987 Grand Wagoner with the 360 2bbl was reated at 140hp crank.
     
  14. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,798
    Likes Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    FUUUU, GM moved 400,000 Monte Carlos in 1976.

    It really was a different world back then.
     
  15. LA02MAX

    LA02MAX New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2006
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Oh look. It's just as ugly as today's monte carlo.
     
  16. Mr3GTP

    Mr3GTP OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    O motherfucking HI-O
    The 1970 Monte SS 454 could move fairly well for such a heavy boat though. But it was a different beast than the castrated shit sold in the mid/late '70s. '71 was the first year of the decline, and it got worse as the '70s progressed.
     
  17. Mr3GTP

    Mr3GTP OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    O motherfucking HI-O
    It lacks the power to "rage". Unless it is;

    1) heavily modified, or

    2) being chain-pulled by a souped-up turbo-diesel pickup.
     
  18. CJPA

    CJPA New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Messages:
    114,304
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    AZ, USA
    That's pretty generous
     
  19. TriShield

    TriShield Super Moderator® Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2001
    Messages:
    132,798
    Likes Received:
    1,698
    Location:
    PRESIDENTIAL TOWER, GREAT AGAIN, NY
    My Google search for the actual curb weight pulled up some fast ones that drag.

    I'm curious what it actually weighs. Weight in old cars is deceptive given their size, many are not as heavy as today's smaller cars.
     
  20. twistid

    twistid Banged By Super Models Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    40,834
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    The Kansass/Oklahomo Border
    if any of them came close to 3200lbs, then it's close to what the 1975 i almost bought iirc... my gf at the time had a 85 buick century, and we were shocked that her car weighed something like 600lbs more.
     
  21. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    Please refer to my AV for clarification.
     
  22. Mr3GTP

    Mr3GTP OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    30,603
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    O motherfucking HI-O

    My '76 Impala weighed ~4400 pounds, IIRC. Full-frame, iron V8, iron rear axle. A little bigger than a Monte though...
     
  23. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    Max or root mean square?

    I really think the idea of rating engines based on the maximum horsepower should be outlawed, the same way it's illegal to rate electrical equipment based on the maximum instantaneous power it can generate or consume, because what matters is the average power over time. I want to know the surface area of the space between the X axis and the torque curve. That's what really determines acceleration, and anyone who's said "yeah it makes 400hp but it has a peaky torque curve" or "yeah it only makes 200hp but the torque curve is flat" already understands the principle.
     
  24. twistid

    twistid Banged By Super Models Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2001
    Messages:
    40,834
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    The Kansass/Oklahomo Border
    i figured you out long ago... that's why i stopped putting effort in responding to you.
     
  25. deusexaethera

    deusexaethera OT Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Messages:
    19,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    Not a fan of people who make jokes from time to time, huh? Oh well.
     

Share This Page